Titou

I agree that most of the stuff we require to use doesn’t need all the options sudo as

Main reason of using doas

but numerous scripts and programs when trying to request explicit super-user permissions, just didn’t know what to do with doas as expected

I’ve only found one software like that and it’s tipi, and it’s kinda dumb for a software to require such a easily replacable software. Also how openbsd users are supposed to do ? Having both doas and sudo on their machine which is unnecessary bloat ?

I’ll stick with doas

Both are important.

Windows is way more documented. Not necessarily by Microsoft but by the absolute waste community.

Kinda hard to provide a full documentation of a os as a particular when you have absolutely no control on it. Also there’s plenty of “windows tutorial” that are either wrong or out of date, while in Arch or most closely Linux there’s things that still remain the same years later.

What you are saying is toxic communities that reply RTFM to every question like arch or gentoo.

Im active on arch communities and i’ve never seen this kind of message, most of the time they give you a hyperlink to a specific chapter of the manual so you know exactly how to fix your issue, not just copy pasta.

Windows is more documented. Not better but more.

Not at all but ok.

Never seen an opinion more biased than this

what’s the point of Proton-GE ? i’ve never head of it before

For this price you can get a high-specs Thinkpad

Never used it but yep you probably could. I’ve took a look at it’s specs and it is has powerful as og vintage laptop we love to use.

I’ve never seen Arch breaking by itself while updating, it may happen if you do “pacman -Sy” instead of “pacman -Syu”

Arch is not less stable than Pop,it’ll always warn you when you’re about to uninstall a sensible package what packages depend on it, in fact if you require performance Arch will be a better value.

Anyway i prefer doas btw