Locking them up helps all the other people they won’t have the opportunity to hurt or kill
Locking them up helps all the other people they won’t have the opportunity to hurt or kill
They tried that once and it didn’t work out very well for them
Maybe we should have given it a less powerful sounding name, or moved away from fossil fuels decades ago idk I’m not a doctor
I just checked my comment history for the last 2 months and I’m not seeing anything like that. I also checked the modlog on Lemmy.World and this is all I can see. At this point I’m going to have to assume you’re just gaslighting me.
Fine, I’ll bite. Which one?
Post pictures of the tree and GPS coordinates. Name and shame.
When the original comment is unserious I don’t think un unserious reply is out of line.
It’s the former. Anyone checking your history would be able to see a pattern of bad faith misinterpretation of other people’s comments, so I’m going to assume that’s what’s going on here, too.
We’re going to keep doing the Genocide Joe thing until Donald Trump has the nuclear codes
Ok but consider that you can turn the soldiers back into juice afterwards. It’s not great fuel but it’s decent lubricant.
I already knew this because I watched RT once at a friend’s house
Ok, now imagine it was a Republican shooting at a GLAAD poster
Canada will treat you right, don’t worry
I’m sure a few thousand Russian tanks also factored into their decision
It could be a bumpy road, but go for it. Remember that no matter what happens, someone else has probably been there before and has asked for help online
For privacy and security? Yes. For usability? Noooo.
They could buy from China
I agree that using cash handouts, debt waivers and other freebies to win votes is bad
You miss 100% of the shots you don’t take. - Wayne Gretzky” - Michael Scott
If only our past behavior could give you some insight into the kind of people we are and how we can be expected to behave in the future. But given the complete absence of data I guess that’s just impossible. Oh well.