https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/mexican-cartels-atf-guns-usa-1235004978/

Ah, a troll gotcha. Nowhere did I say China was good. That is just a bad faith take. I was hoping you were actually trying to learn. Don’t bother responding, you are blocked.

Censorship, what does that have to do with the current conversation of the United States attempts at censorship of the Pro-Palestine narrative?

My friend, do you think China does not benefit from the destabilization caused by putting the USA’s blatant support of the ongoing genocide in Gaza on display for all the world to see? Does China have USA’s best interest at heart, no. Is this platform allowing the continued growth of Pro-Palestine support, yes.

The opposite, actually. I do agree that the “ban unless sold” situation with tiktok stems from lack of control over the narrative due to the crackdowns we are seeing on college protests.

https://www.hrw.org/report/2023/12/21/metas-broken-promises/systemic-censorship-palestine-content-instagram-and

Hmm, sounds like Big Science is trying to sell more Earth.

https://www.bls.gov/ooh/life-physical-and-social-science/environmental-scientists-and-specialists.htm

Money and/or power.

It is astonishing that the leads on this game didn’t take any notes on the successful parts of other team shooters released during that timeframe.

Gru mentioned.

Yeah, I guess I can see your point. I was under the impression that a lot more people were aware of the root of that word. I grew up reading a lot of books, so I guess that factored into my view. Thanks for the perspective, I am all for phasing out legitimately problematic language.

So based off of that comment alone and the context surrounding it, do you truly believe their intent was to be misogynistic or were they using slang to emphisize their frustration while calling Biden a coward?

I am fairly certain “pussy” is slang for pusillanimous. Can it be used misogynisticly, yes. Was that the intent here, I don’t think so based off the context.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pusillanimous

More watch time/interaction = more algorithm training and ad exposure. I would imagine the profits will outweigh the expenses, especially if the pay is $1 for every 50 watched videos or something.

Top 10% in the US hold 70% and the bottom 50% hold 1%, that is still pretty gross.

https://financebuzz.com/us-net-worth-statistics

Thank goodness, I was worried they might forget about the shareholders in pursuit of stopping the end of civilization as we know it.

The police, they are literally working against their own interest when they arrest her. I probably should have clarified that.

When will they learn.

1. Porn websites should not have to do a parent’s job
2. They would have to either host a metric shit ton of personal IDs on their servers or have direct access to that database. I would absolutely not be willing to entrust my ID to any site that was not a government site.

If you are interested in seeing why this is a bad idea, I’d recommend looking up the KOSA bill (US version of this) and watching arguments against it.

It will kill industries temporarily, until the corpos realize their success came from the artists.

God damn, you are absolutely correct. Egg on my face for not checking the source I used. Comment deleted.