• 0 Posts
  • 36 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle

  • Any hard drive can fail at any time with or without warning. Worrying too much about individual drive families’ reliability isn’t worth it if you’re dealing with few drives. Worry instead about backups and recovery plans in case it does happen.

    Bigger drives have significantly lower power usage per TB, and cost per TB is lowest around 12-16TB. Bigger drives also lets you fit more storage in a given box. Drives 12TB and up are all currently helium filled which run significantly cooler.

    Two preferred options in the data hoarder communities are shucking (external drives are cheaper than internal, so remove the case) and buying refurb or grey market drives from vendors like Server Supply or Water Panther. In both cases, the savings are usually big enough that you can simply buy an extra drive to make up for any loss of warranty.

    Under US$15/TB is typically a ‘good’ price.

    For media serving and deep storage, HDDs are still fine and cheap. For general file storage, consider SSDs to improve IOPS.










  • Indeed, the US has a major lack of fixed-line competition and lack of regulation. Starlink doesn’t really help with that, at least in urban areas.

    I’m not familiar with the wireless situation. You’re saying that there are significant coverage discrepancies to the point where many if not most consumers are choosing a carrier based on coverage, not pricing/plans? There’s always areas with unequal coverage but I didn’t think they were that common.

    Here in NZ, the state funding for very rural 4G broadband (Rural Broadband Initiative 2 / RBI-2) went to the Rural Connectivity Group, setting up sites used and owned equally by all three providers, to reduce costs where capacity isn’t the constraint.


  • Starlink plugs the rural coverage gaps, but in urban areas it’s still more expensive than either conventional fixed-line connections or wireless (4G/5G) broadband. Even in rural areas, while it’s the best option, it’s rarely the cheapest, at least in the NZ market I’m familiar with.

    It also doesn’t have the bandwidth per square kilometre/mile to serve urban areas well, and it’s probably never going to work in apartment buildings.

    This is a funding/subsidisation issue, not so much a technical one. I imagine Starlink connections are eligible for the current subsidy, but in most cases it’s probably going to conventional DSL/cable/fibre/4G connections.


  • As ‘colony breadbaskets’, with lots of land and small populations, both NZ and Aus used to export lots of meat and other primary industry products to the UK.

    I believe the UK’s entry into the EEC and deprioritisation of the commonwealth led to those exports reducing and instead heading to Asia and the US.

    Regardless, expecting to export beef to the other side of the world, a country with four times the cattle and a better reputation for food production, is just daft.

    I don’t think I’ve ever seen any UK-sourced food in NZ other than high-value small stuff like Worcester sauce, and expat reminder-of-home products.


  • Aggregate bandwidth now rivals or slightly exceeds gigabit wired connections.

    Where that aggregate bandwidth is shared amongst large numbers of users, bandwidth per user can suffer dramatically.

    Low density areas may be fine, but cube farms are an issue especially when staff are doing data intensive or latency sensitive tasks.

    If you’re giving employees docking stations for their laptops, running ethernet to those docking stations is a no-brainer.

    Moving most of the traffic to wired connections frees up spectrum/bandwidth for situations that do need to be wireless.


  • The actual eruption happened in 2019. It was big news locally when it happened, and there has been a slow trickle of further reports like this one.

    It wasn’t a particularly big eruption; the fact that people were on the rather small volcanic island when it erupted is what led to the deaths.

    The efforts towards a prosecution have been long and slow because it’s probably going to be a real mess:

    • Adventure tourism including visiting active volcanoes is inherently dangerous.

    • Did the scientists get the volcano risk levels wrong?

    • Which entities should get criminal blame? Island owner, tour providers, tour transport providers (boats), and/or the various regulators?

    It sounds like that’s all sorted and they’re into sentencing on those that were found guilty.