What’s he gonna do? Send his mom to sit on my face?
What’s he gonna do? Send his mom to sit on my face?
People throw them out of their car windows too. I see them on the ground all the time. Insanity.
They’ll keep doing it so that they can have an out group to blame for people’s problems.
If your instance disappears, then how can you make sure that you could use your same username on an instance that is created after that one disappears?
You could decentralize user accounts so that they aren’t attached to any instance, or at least the account owner can move their account from one instance to another.
I’m gonna say it, Blockchain might actually have a usecase for Lemmy accounts.
Sort by “active” that’s where the most discussion is happening
Can’t even visit certain subs without their shit app.
One of us!
Not even necessarily scams. I backed the CHIP sbc by nextthingco back in the day and it turned out fine. Then I backed their next project and they got tied up with a lawsuit over the name and wound up bankrupt.
The company “flock safety” operates license plate cameras across the country. They allow any subscribing law enforcement agency to access all of the data. I believe this includes agencies in foreign countries.
"The product was not ours. It was only that it had our brand on it,”
It is a punishment in the form of public humiliation, taking your autonomy, and dehumanizing you. People will automatically assume you’ve done something wrong if you’re in handcuffs.
So you engaged with the content, the ultimate reason why it was created in the first place. He’s not going to go through the trouble if it doesn’t make money. Might as well just scream into the void if nobody watches it.
Did you watch the video on YouTube?
What did the journalist gain by confronting him? Nothing we didn’t already know.
What is your definition of won? Because that’s what it means.
The rest of the paragraph?
It was probably the best result he could expect. And that is before the interview became viral and millions upon millions got to hear his whole speech delivered. The journalist is well intentioned, but the result is catastrophic.
Replace the word “won” with “got what he wanted from”
I don’t know what you guys are seeing, but it is quite clear that Trump’s guy
wongot what he wanted from this exchange. It was probably the best result he could expect. And that is before the interview became viral and millions upon millions got to hear his whole speech delivered. The journalist is well intentioned, but the result is catastrophic.
Journalists will do whatever gets engagement to show numbers to advertisers and this kind of crap gets engagement as seen here. Whenever you engage with this type of content you are giving these people a platform to spout nonsense and lies.
Australian government is pretty hamfisted when it comes to this stuff.