• 0 Posts
  • 277 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 24th, 2023

help-circle








  • The challenge is both the production time and the high cost of such a high-tech missile. Typically, the US Navy fires two missiles at each given airborne target to guarantee its downing, and an interceptor missile costs millions of dollars, much more than the Iranian missiles it shoots down.

    This was always going to be a problem and it’s their fault for not moving sooner on it.

    If an adversaries missiles costs a million dollars, how do you challenge them? Make missiles that costs less and overwhelm them.

    Not only do you gotta worry about Iran’s or others cheaper missiles, but now there’s drones that are a fraction of the cost.

    If the US enters a major conflict, I wouldn’t be surprised to see high value assets get lost or damaged due this problem.

    Lets see the US come out with some new advances in tech with lower cost.



  • The Pentagon is directly working with SpaceX on this. Awhile ago they said they had a handle on it but that it was going to be an ongoing problem as Russian evades their measures.

    This was in May, and they’ve obviously figured another way around.

    “At this time we have successfully countered Russian use, but I am certain Russia will continue to try and find ways to exploit Starlink and other commercial communications systems,” Plumb said. "It will continue to be a problem, I think we’ve wrapped our heads around it and found good solutions with both Starlink and Ukraine.”