How do you think those rankings will change with the current and upcoming changes implemented? Maybe 2, 5, or 10 years from now?

modem dialing sound

Wie my own name in it.

You forgot the part where the insurance cost goes up for all insured people even if they don’t own a Tesla.

When I lean into them all I get is boos.

EU has recent regulations that only apply to the big platforms. That’s one way to implement that.

Fight for regulation

The only thing that can stop them from their established position of power and influence is regulation that limits those, with effective checks and prosecution.

Split up their platforms and companies, require transparency and provable decency, require structural or behavioral changes

They have so much money, fines won’t do a thing [unless they’re excessively high and against their companies]. They have such established prevalence with their platforms, activism of and with evasion won’t have much of an impact at scale.

Demonstrating public aversion towards advertisers is also a workable approach that could have an impact [long term].

What’s your process? Where in the process does the knowledge get lost?

My learning process back when I was studying has always been to summarize the material. Go through it, and write out a summary, and what was non-obvious to me. And then, if applicable, summarize that summarization, reducing what I could clear up.

Ah, sorry. Turns out the one I got two years ago isn’t a Compact either. (I had Compacts previously, and didn’t want a big phone then either.)

The 10 V I got is not as big as some of the other big phones, but it is a bit bigger and significantly longer than Compact was previously. 155x68x8.3mm

If communities were standing alone, that idea would work. But communities are hosted and shared on an instance. I find it questionable in that context; it’s a slippery slope.

Should an instance’s users be able to vote on every community they see in their local feed, or should only community members be able to? Instance admins may decide a community does not violates instance rules, while users may feel like it does not fit the spirit or goals or mentality of an instance.

It could work if only community members can vote in their communities. Then you could make community-specific decisions and consequences, and the border of instance and community would be separated by definition.

How would such rules work across federation?

Sure, one instance can make their rules regarding it. But if everything they federate with ignore them, do they have to exclude all federated votes? Would they have to filter all votes according to some technical-representable rules?

I’ve seen it too often on Lemmy too.

Most are of what you describe, but not all of them. I have seen valuable background checks before (back on Reddit). I specifically remember an elaborate post about bots/botnet.

I don’t like your dismissive qualification of “have so little going on in their lives”. Some background checks are good and important. Dismissing people who are willing to invest into that in general, but also dismissing people who “have nothing better to do” for their situation, feels like an awful, uncalled-for, inappropriate insult.

/edit: Rewording to better get my point across.

https://www.socialeurope.eu/wage-productivity-gap-four-tales-from-the-eurozone has some graphs, although I don’t see data sources

Sony has their Xperia Compact series.

• Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact - 129x65x9.3mm
• Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact - 135x65x12.1mm