It’s also worth giving them the benefit of a doubt. It might be just a bug or an oversight.
I don’t see how player data even would be worth risking GDPR fines. But at least you don’t have to worry about it.
It’s also worth giving them the benefit of a doubt. It might be just a bug or an oversight.
I don’t see how player data even would be worth risking GDPR fines. But at least you don’t have to worry about it.
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) gives individuals the right to ask for their data to be deleted and organisations do have an obligation to do so, except in the following cases:
- the personal data your company/organisation holds is needed to exercise the right of freedom of expression;
- there is a legal obligation to keep that data;
- for reasons of public interest (for example public health, scientific, statistical or historical research purposes).
You can’t delete your account if you’re banned? Seems a bit iffy.
This will greatly enhance the intelligence of future generations and make education accessible to almost everyone on earth at a similar high level.
You mean at the current ChatGPT level? Because I’m unsure if the future versions will be open source or open access, if not surely it will just raise the disparity in education.
Yeah, might. It’s good good to question it even if that’s the case. Maybe next time someone will think twice about doing something similar if it’s not consensual.
Bitching about people switching to more dangerous substances makes the case to legalize it, nothing more.
Do the AI scrapers use FediBuzz or just the same method as FediBuzz? If the latter, couldn’t the servers just issue a private API key (or whatever, I’m not that tech savvy) for FediBuzz?
Unfortunately, Mastodon is killing FediBuzz in its next 4.2 update.
Any idea why they’re doing this?
It makes more sense to think about it like that.
Did I say that somewhere?
And calling review bombers reviewers, like they offer legitimate unique criticism is kinda funny too.
Because they took OW1, changed very little, made it a lot more microtransactiony, didn’t release a promised co-op mode that basically was the reasoning to release OW2. I’m sure there’s more but that’s about it.
For sure, agreed. Major downgrade and when I tried it at launch it still had the same queue problems OW1 had so not like they even fixed anything for a casual player.
But I’m pretty sure we both know Overwatch 2 isn’t the worst game available. (I’m not going to go out of my way defend OW2 to anyone, it’s not worth it.)
Yeah these review bombings are ridiculous, so what? Am I not free to express my opinion? And I’m not quite sure how anyone’s not allowed to have their opinion, if it’s dumb then you can call it dumb.
People are voicing their opinions, what’s the big deal? We should all agree with these gamer tantrums?
I’m not s fan but if you really think it’s the worst game on Steam woof…
Which I think is kinda weird decision since they could’ve just hidden a setting that unlocks all addons in the options. But maybe they were so incompatible at the time that it wasn’t worth the headache.
Not an expert but as I’ve understood it it’s pretty similar to Fennec, less tracking and more private than your regular Firefox. I don’t know anything about either ones development team size or activity either so I can’t recommend one over the other. Hopefully someone with more knowledge can chime in.
Same for Firefox forks, Mull and Fennec.
My understanding is that USB-C as a standard is pretty all over the place. Some can fast charge etc. So my guess is that Apple will come up with some superduper performance USB-C or they’ll at least present it as such. And why not sooner? Because they were in the lab perfecting it.
Emotions motivate everyone.
It’s insulting and counter productive to say this thing is about dumb people following their emotions when education, money and opportunities play such a big part.