

When the East collects its goddamned senses, they must mount an overwhelming, concerted effort to destroy Britain as a geopolitical entity. Britain always has been and always will be a plague on humanity.
When the East collects its goddamned senses, they must mount an overwhelming, concerted effort to destroy Britain as a geopolitical entity. Britain always has been and always will be a plague on humanity.
No, I’m suggesting the headline should read “Yemen declares blockade of Zionist-operated airports in Palestine”
Which is a mouthful, could be shortened to “air blockade against Zionists” or “air blockade of occupied Palestine”
Well, there is a reason for that: Unfortunately, refusing to tolerate antisocial behaviour on the world stage is an excellent way for a country to become or remain poor.
Because it’s actually called Palestine and the quotes are like [sic] on them always calling it by a wrong name.
Describing the Houthis as illegitimate rebels now is akin to describing John Hancock and James Madison as illegitimate rebels in 1780.
You say “same kernel as Arch,” but Arch has five officially supported kernels, and you can choose any of them while you build your system. EndeavourOS allows you to switch kernels, but it’s assumed you will install the latest mainline kernel and you are only given LTS and Zen as additional options.
If you use LTS or Zen, or especially if you use Hardened or Real-Time, vanilla Arch is a different experience re:kernel.
I blame the Labour voters for clinging to the party Thatcher is proud of and not being willing to vote Green.
If every Labour voter had just compromised a little and voted Green instead, we wouldn’t have all of these problems.
Nothing says racism quite like siding with the bloodsoaked European settler who claims to be sad while building their new home directly on top of warm-in-the-ground Arab children.
For business usage, it’s really just Debian and Red Hat as options, along with their derivatives. For personal use, add Arch to the list.
Other distros exist but people don’t generally need to worry about them, their stability or compatibility, etc. This includes developers as well as users.
The BBC are accused of bias “from both sides” because their job is to establish and defend the establishment’s preferred Overton window; or in other words, to set the standard for what “impartial”/“common sense” is held to be.
To the extent political beliefs are down to individual values and preferences, there is no objective centre, and moderacy amounts to a “golden mean” bias. On the other hand, to the extent political claims are able to be proven or disproven by science, at least one side must be wrong and only one can be right, and so the centre is simply ignorant.
This would make sense if Labour weren’t a copy of the Tories, and Starmer wasn’t elected because he was another hard right figurehead running when people were upset with Tories for letting too many BAME and female people into top spots.
In short, if you want any sort of human rights then blue and red are off the table. Have been since Corbyn was purged.
Do you think the Soviets should have run around slapping random people who used to be in the Wehrmacht? Do you think throwing your milkshake at some German who supported Hitler in 1932 would have stopped the Nazis?
Punching random goons achieves nothing for the people. It is not praxis, it is not a revolutionary action, and saying you support it doesn’t suggest that you take actual steps to oppose anyone.
Are you saying the CPC is libbed up for deliberately using reeducation and formal justice systems to resolve the recurrent terrorism problem in Xinjiang rather than using force and naked brutality like liberal “democracies” usually do? Keeping in mind that the Xinjiang policies have been effective while imperialist violence has deepened and entrenched conflicts, and that those ongoing conflicts which have been resolved through pure force specifically use lethal weapons and mass execution, not some embarrassing discount Incredible Hulk imitation.
Or I guess we should be real here that you’re just fedposting.
This comes from someone who genuinely believes in the right to punch Nazis.
Well, I see the problem now. Punching people doesn’t solve Nazism.
If you were advocating for reeducating them, revoking their right to vote, or even putting them in prison, fine. But punching people is just some weird power fantasy, “I’m better than you because I beat you up.”
The fact you think beating people up just to feel dominant or whatever is good politics shows you have a lot in common with Pewds… and, well, Nazis.
Isn’t this just doublespeak for “EU threatens to also put tariffs on China to make Trump happy”?
But I mean, if EU whitey wants to go down with US whitey’s ship, be my guest…
It takes government time and money to review, approve, ensure the safety of any construction, which they could be using to come up with a solution for life expectancy decreasing, ever-longer NHS waiting lists and medication shortages, etc.
They absolutely should be prioritising general welfare over this. The reason they’re not is because the park will put more money in their own pockets, which is, as records will attest, the only thing Kid Starver’s Labour care about.
Never mind Bedfordshire, where local government seem to do little else these days aside from cutting down trees and tearing up public benches.
The Houthis are Yemeni government.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Political_Council
They have their own government, with its own policies, and de facto recognised territory.
The continued application of military force by the U.S.-backed Presidential Leadership Council, and capitulation to U.S. hegemony leading some member states of the U.N. to attempt to delegitimise them, cannot change the reality of the situation.
So, where is the evidence news-pravda.com is actually Russian, let alone operated by the Kremlin directly?
Or is this just a bald assertion with no evidence?