A friend dragged me into an extracurricular competitive programming when we were in school. Had to code in Pascal, of all languages.
Funny thing is, the first session was full to the point of people having to stand, a month or two later only 3 people attended, and that’s when it stopped.
“takes a conservative turn” - how to spot a journalist who learned about russia yesterday.
“It’s NoT iSrAeL iT’S jUsT nEtAnYaHu” smells very much like “It’s NoT rUsSiA iT’S jUsT pUtIn”.
deleted by creator
Keed using it, set up smartd to check up on it regularly and send you an email if something goes wrong.
Do you want zombie apocalypse? Because that’s how you get zombie apocalypse.
I think it’s like this: what used to be group in regular permissions output is a union of group and ACL mask in ACL output. Mask sets the upper limit of what ACL can do, so if mask is rw- then it’s impossible to set a r-x ACL permission because allowing execution is not allowed.
This seems to be more geared towards enterprise environment where it could be complicated to cleanly define groups, since you can only give access to one you might run into a problem where dept. A needs access to that directory but also person G from dept. B and person K from dept. C.
If the traffic is encrypted, how would they know?