It’s that it’s only predicting the next token in a string of text.
An LLM has an internal state while predicting text. The “next token” chosen takes that state - a model of the world - into account. So a LLM is predicting the next token based on a world model and the previous text.
Saying that it is “only predicting the next token”, without more context, while technically true is very misleading.
Doesn’t make sense. If O’Donnell is in league with Trump, then why would she be butchering Trump like this?
And it has gotta be pretty obvious which trades are likely insider trading. So SEC could likely trivially prosecute them - and I assume it is blatantly illegal.
But I assume that Trump has also corrupted the SEC.
Generally it gets a bit muddy at such a stage.
I think international law is actually pretty clear, in general. You don’t get to shoot at every ship that moves.
Are trade ships that are trading with the enemy, not expressly and officially guaranteed by Oman not valid targets
Iran is shooting all the ships. It is pretty clear that “legality” is not a concern Iran has.
If anything, Iran, in its desperation, is fighting well against the superest most bigliest ultra fascist state in the making.
This seems to be the root. You see that Trump/USA is evil here, which it is. And then somehow conclude that Iran must be good, if Iran is fighting against Trump.
Iran is evil too. Fucking evil. Killing innocent civilians deliberately and laughing at it evil.
There is a trend of ignoring how evil some of the Muslim groupings in the Middle East are. That has got to stop. It almost seem like “white man’s burden” - as if people think Muslims don’t have agency to know right from wrong.
They are fully allowed to close it
According to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), ships have a right to transit international straits like the Straight of Hormuz. Article 38 to be exact: https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf
at least on their side of the strait.
And as you say, their side. But it is quite clear that Iran has closed the whole thing, also the part Iran has no right to.
Whether Oman is a party in this war (given their harboring of US bases and military assets) is up to debate.
Has Oman allowed attacks from the bases (I don’t actually know)? If not, then Oman is not party to the war. But it seems pretty clear that Iran would not restrain itself in either case, right?
And in any case, this is civilian ships, which are not valid targets even in a war.
So he is saying that Iran is not responsible for *checks notes* Iran selectively and deliberately hitting ships of third party nations not involved in the war? That is not how moral responsibility works. How old is he, 5 years old?
Marge is an opportunistic rat, who is abandoning the sinking ship. She is just positioning herself for the next grift,