• orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are you aware that it’s possible to want neither NATO tanks nor Russian tanks in Ukraine?

    I am.

    But do you believe Ukraine is able to maintain their territory protected from Russia without NATO’s weapon supply?

    • Sphere [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He most likely doesn’t believe Ukraine is able to maintain their territory protected from Russia with NATO’s weapon supply, and for good reason, given how clearly this is demonstrated by the utter failure of the vaunted counter-offensive. The only thing your position is really advocating is the useless deaths of vast numbers of Ukrainians (and Russians, for that matter).

      • teichflamme@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The mere fact that they are in the act of a counter offensive after Russia tried to blitz then shows that it’s not even close to what you’re describing.

        Ukraine is holding their current territory pretty easily and gaining the upper hand very clearly.

        • Russia tried to blitz

          The mere fact that you believe this shows how steeped in western propaganda you are

          At no point was Russia’s strategy a blitz, this is a lie meant to equate Russia with nazi Germany and Pitin With Hitler even though it’s still ukkkraine celebrating Bandara as a national hero

          No Russia’s gameplan from the start has been what it has been for almost 100 years, Soviet tactics not that that coked up nazi blitzkreig bullshit

          The attack on Kiev was likely a feint

          Ukraine is holding their current territory pretty easily and gaining the upper hand very clearly.

          The cope levels are off the charts