• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    About 400 pedestrians are killed, which, as a pedestrian, is the figure I’m interested in.

    And good. Let’s see how keen they are to cut costs (which is 100% why Uber would rather have a machine rather than a driver take the wheel) when their predecessors are languishing in HMP Parkhurst.

    I don’t give consent to share my space with automated vehicles. Limit them to 20pmh in all built up areas (same for cars with drivers tbh). I don’t care how many million miles of motorway driving is done safely. That’s not where I am. If I need to cross road, sometimes a driver will flash his lights and wave me over. Do you trust a machine to do that? I certainly don’t.

    • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      First of let me state that I’m not arguing for Uber or automation. I personally believe we should collectively say fuck cars. But I’m also for a level playing field and by all reports, there’s less accidents when the driving is automated.

      Let’s see how keen they are to cut costs

      There was something posted a while back in [email protected] that said robotaxis are unviable as a business for now. We’re far away from them reducing costs.

      Do you trust a machine to do that?

      If programmed to, yeah… moreso than humans.

      But again, I’m not advocating for Uber. Just thought your initial comment seemed unfair.