• Cylusthevirus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    How could it be better? There’d be no one around to make that judgment call, so it’s a fundamentally illogical statement.

    And I calls em like I sees em Mr. Saturday Morning Cartoon Villain Apologist.

      • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Surely the core arguments that an anti-natalist might bring forward apply to any sentient beings, right? Like, a cat didn’t give prior consent to existing any more than a human did. Ergo, I do think it’s reasonable to point out that there would be no observer that could witness, much less enjoy any benefit from, the anti-natalist ideal world.