No company in the history of electronics has ever been in the habit of remotely bricking devices, get real.
And yes, I’ve read it - ON TOP of that, I’m familiar with these types of clauses in a real world basis. Let me tell you, you’re off in lala land with your interpretation.
You seem to be doing everything to ignore the fact that they now have the right and ability to do it. Which is all that was being said and you disagreed with.
I don’t care about what usually happens. We usually don’t pay for the tutorial to a new system either, but here we are. Things change.
Let me tell you, you’re off in lala land with your interpretation
Ok, what part am I misunderstanding about being able to disable the hardware in part or whole? How does being able to make the “Nintendo device permanently unusable in whole or in part” not allow them to brick it? I’m hoping with a real world basis it will be easy.
No company in the history of electronics has ever been in the habit of remotely bricking devices, get real.
And yes, I’ve read it - ON TOP of that, I’m familiar with these types of clauses in a real world basis. Let me tell you, you’re off in lala land with your interpretation.
You seem to be doing everything to ignore the fact that they now have the right and ability to do it. Which is all that was being said and you disagreed with.
I don’t care about what usually happens. We usually don’t pay for the tutorial to a new system either, but here we are. Things change.
Ok, what part am I misunderstanding about being able to disable the hardware in part or whole? How does being able to make the “Nintendo device permanently unusable in whole or in part” not allow them to brick it? I’m hoping with a real world basis it will be easy.