• KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This seems as unlikely to be true, as it does sensationalist. Hate on Bitcoin all ya like, but don’t make off the cuff “calculations” and report it as news.

  • nexguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Doesn’t the lightning network which is millions of times faster than btc alone solve this?

  • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Crypto is entirely an extremely expensive gambling system. It serves no actual explainable purpose for the vast majority of people. It’s trivially provable to be worse than existing alternatives in every way that isn’t scams and or money laundering.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, yeah, it’s bad. We shouldn’t be ignoring how bad bitcoin is for the environment.

    But are you really gonna tell me that all the computers and CPU time that Wall Street uses for trading somehow takes less?

    It doesn’t matter what financial system you use, you’re still burning energy to make it work.

    • zeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      As far as transactions, yes, something like Visa takes way less than Bitcoin. For HFT compared to crypto, who knows, but one thing they’re not doing is something intentionally wasteful like proof of work.