• Cocopanda@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    6 days ago

    When facts and knowledge don’t align with your bullshit. Just force it to accept lies as truth.

    What a bunch of shithawks. Randy.

  • Naevermix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is the final phase of this AI hype. It’s not generating any profits so it’s desperately fighting for government intervention.

    • Omega@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Don’t mind me but I’m not against being paid to create a hive mind of CCP bots ah haha

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7 days ago

    corpo translation: left leaning folks in the US are generally more educated currently and are more likely to critically question whether a social media account is a corporate bot and question our bots when they shill products, so we’re going to target the less educated population by appealing to their populist politics of rage bait and xenophobia.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        yea, i family member that did this, starting earning more 100k+ propaganda from joe-roagan because made him a trump fan, caught him several times listening to Trumps rambling as background noise. gymbros also tend to lean conservatives too. people like right wing grifters during the pandemic helped, these people used these right wingers a coping mechanism.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        My best guess, college educated people tend to make more money and therefore leaned toward the more business friendly Republicans.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          alot of tech people starting moving the right, because they are earning bank, plus they are in the gymbro culture too.

          • vxx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            Tech people arent smarter than everbody else. They developed a god complex, though.

    • cotlovan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      6 days ago

      Hahaha, “the left are more educated” hahaha. Bruh, this sub is just filled to the brim with radical leftists.

      • vxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        this sub is just filled to the brim with radical leftists.

        Lemmy in general, but it doesnt make them wrong on this.

        • cotlovan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          6 days ago

          That the left is “more educated”? I’d press “doubt” on that. Radical lefties are just as closed minded as the radical right. Supporting the new shiny trend doesn’t make one smarter.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    7 days ago

    Imagine using all the recipes known to man to build a chef bot that can cook “both types of cuisine.”

    Or wait, maybe the implication is that the bot only made edible food before, and now it can make the other kind too?

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can win. In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit.

      — Ayn Rand

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Ayn Rand made a good point here as long as you exclude the context of what she considered good and evil.

        For context, Ayn Rand’s “good” includes unfettered capitalism, personal wealth, individualism, and oligarchy. Her “evil” includes industrial regulations, charity, social responsibility, and democracy. That certainly puts a different flavor on her statement, doesn’t it?

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          7 days ago

          It does. Here’s my fav concise critique of capitalism:

          Man’s freedom is lacking if somebody else controls what he needs, for need may result in man’s enslavement of man.

          — Muammar Gaddafi

  • khepri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yes, if there’s something every good scientist knows, its to present the best current understanding of something, and then the exact opposite of that, framed as being equally valid. For sure this is the way forward and good on you Zuck!

  • LavaPlanet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    The terminator movies had it wrong, this is how Ai became all human hatey, on the timeline.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    Both sides, as in, the fair, balanced, and upbringing right view, and the evil menace to society that’s the destroying left sickos.

    You know, being neutral and all that.

    • SippyCup@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      “we should hear both sides!” Is and always has been an argument from people who know they are wrong, who want to pollute the available information from the people who are right.

  • Atmoro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 days ago

    Are there any good open-source community-made models that aren’t owned by corporations or at least owned by a Non-Profit/ Public Benefit Corporation?

      • dermanus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m in software and we’re experimenting with using it for certain kinds of development work, especially simpler things like fixing identified vulnerabilities.

        We also have a pilot started to see if one can explain and document an old code base no one knows anymore.

        • cmhe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Good code documentation describes why something is done, and no just what or how.

          To answer why you have to understand the context, and often, you have to be there when the code was written and went through the various iterations.

          LLMs might be able to explain what is done, with some margin of error, but why something is done, I would be very surprised.

          • dermanus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            you have to be there when the code was written and went through the various iterations.

            Well, we don’t have that. We’re mostly dealing with other people’s mistakes and tech debt. We have messy things like nested stored procedures.

            If all we get is some high level documentation of how components interact I’m happy. From there we can start splitting off the useful chunks for human review.

        • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          I can honestly see a use case for this. But without backing it up with some form of technical understanding, I think you’re just asking for trouble.

          • dermanus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            100%, we’re doing human and automated reviews on the code changes, and the code explanation is just the first step of several.

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I ask it questions all the time and it helps verify facts if I’m looking for more information

        • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          If you are believing what those things are popping out wholesale without double-checking to see if they’re feeding you fever dreams you are an absolute fool.

          I don’t think I’ve seen a single statement come out of an LLM that hasn’t had some element of daydreamy nonsense in it. Even small amounts of false information can cause a lot of damage.

          • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yea what’s your point. That’s basic understanding of getting information from anywhere. LLM Excel at querying information using human language. If I’m stuck trying to remember some obscure thing on the tip of my tongue and all I have to go off of is the color of a shirt, the accent and general time period then LLM beat everything out of the water in speed to get me the correct answer

  • sad_detective_man@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    why the fuck is he so ugly. like not even trying to correlate it to virtue he literally is just more hideous than the average technocrat shithead

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      because they made his model a tad too realistic, but not enough. it’s a well known problem in robotics called uncanny valley, it triggers a visceral reaction in people.

    • StJohnMcCrae@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      The fact he hired a stylist to help him look more like Jack Harlow is hilarious. Bro, you’re 40. Trying to look like Augustus Caesar is finally age appropriate - why are you changing it up NOW?

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        hes like “DATA” but without charm, or acting of brent spiner, not even lore, since zuck doesnt have emotions.

  • conicalscientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Notice the “free market” vanishes when it’s a thing they don’t like. Suddenly we need strong authority to ensure it’s “fair”.