• scratchee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I agree there’s a distinction between the 2 markets. I’d place it more on the style of monetisation than anything else, but I’ll admit there’s a difference.

    But I still think using the platform to distinguish them is unhelpful, phones aren’t going anywhere, they’ll grow as a market and slowly absorb parts of the console and pc markets, so either the non-casual phone games industry needs to grow, or casual games will be the only games left. I think it’s fair to say that phones are currently infested with low effort casual games with awful monetisation strategies, but they don’t have to be, and quality games do exist on the platform and do have a following, my hope is that continues to grow and finds a niche on the platform, so hopefully you see why I dislike defining the platform as casual with “novelties”

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I get why ya want phone gaming to get better, but I am describing what im seeing and what I am seeing is a market thats absolutely seperate from the core gaming market.

      Also I severely doubt casual console or PC gaming will be absorbed by phone, unless some phone companies accept the existence of active cooling at minimum. But there also the fact that handhelds in general are a good bit behind even consoles which tend to be behind PCs. The ultra casual gaming market that allowed the Wii to be the best selling console is the same group now largely on phones. Theres a reason Xbox and Playstation stopped factoring in Nintendo as competition. Phones need to aim towards games thatd fit into the same niche as the gameboy or DS.

      Anyways I tire of this conversation have a good day dude.