• acastcandream@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    8 years of security not OS support.

    I don’t want a phone like most phones for $800USD. Especially one that’s slower, has a worse camera, etc. It needs either more impressive features or to be $200 cheaper. Otherwise why bother? Ultimately this boils down to price and features if they want to actually break into the market. The repair-ability alone isn’t enough.

    • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Fair wages for the people making the phone is also a selling point of this phone. It’s not just about repairability.

      That said I’m also not writing this from a Fairphone, because the price is too high for me.

    • Square Singer@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The high price actually cancels the point of the repairability. I can get a similar phone for easily €400-500 less. If I budget that extra price for repairs, I can get the battery and screen replaced quite a few times.

      I say that as an FP4 owner, who did the same calculation mistake there.

    • hascat@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      slower

      How fast do you need your phone to be for sending messages, streaming video, or browsing the web? Every phone made in the last decade can do these things.