President-elect Donald Trump stunned the Pentagon and the broader defense world by nominating Fox News host Pete Hegseth to serve as his defense secretary, tapping someone largely inexperienced and untested on the global stage to take over the world’s largest and most powerful military.

Archive link

      • PwnTra1n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        right now they are but soon they might not be the ones with the power and they can be removed. its very possible. remember hitlers generals tried to kill him

  • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    How have I figured out that we are under active Russian attack and takeover and the Pentagon hasn’t?

    I’m not stunned. This is his plan.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Fun fact, in this kind of war, the last thing you do is tell the bad guys you know what they’re doing. That’s some Hollywood shit.

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What I cannot believe is MAGA is revolting against the Marco Rubio pick.

    Conspiracy nuts are more critical of their glorious leader than Democrats.

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      That’s funny, he’s the one who’s not a completely fucking disgusting prick. I don’t like him, but he’s not actively a terrorist or anything, that I know of.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    A tiny sliver of hope.

    I know the sorts of oaths I had to take when I was in the military. I didn’t really enjoy my time there and I still took them seriously.

    Those folks at the Pentagon, I would hope, are the sort that take them very seriously. And it is your duty to refuse unlawful orders.

    If there’s enough “good ones” left, we might see some resistance coming from that area.

    Edit: Hey folks I know plenty of people have an axe to grind with the US military. And you are welcome to post your axe in reply to my comment. But I’m not really interested in carrying water for every wrongful or unpopular thing that the US military has ever done. I got out for (many) reasons. So please don’t expect a reply!

    • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This is how we are checkmated into civil war OR Putin takeover.

      Either we let Trump/Elon stay in office and Putin takes over that way. Before Jan 20, they will all be releasing increasingly inflammatory information to incite a civil war. If we don’t go to war, Putin will finish taking us over and will have access to our resources and military. With that he will literally take over the world.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I’ve been out a long time and was of low rank in any case. However, I’m skeptical that safeguards don’t exist that will make that less effective than it sounds.

        For one thing, the duty to disobey unlawful orders goes all the way to the lowest E1. (And when I was in, having grounds to refuse such an order and be justifiably defiant felt like Dobby hoping for Malfoy to give him clothes - it was unlikely, but I was always ready to go, and I don’t think I was alone there.)

        But I am doubtful that Trump can successfully reach a point where all or even enough of the top brass are willing to drink his flavor aid to not have to worry about them.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I have a different hope, that Trump will ruin their actual offensive capacity and save the world from the Pentagon. The US can not be trusted with its own military.

      • ryepunk [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        55 minutes ago

        I can’t wait until his son’s begin an arms manufacturing company and get hundreds of billions in defense contracts and then entire companies of troops get owned in war when their guns spontaneously explode in their face and the tanks rounds detonates prior to firing. Capitalist efficiency!

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I don’t fail to appreciate your viewpoint, but while such a military exists, I’d like stopping 21st century Hitler before he can get started to be a service they provide.

        • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Oh, so the US military should intervene in the Palestinian genocide on the side of Palestine, right? And then pay reparations to Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, and all the other places the US has slaughtered in the past 20 years alone.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The military is already struggling to recruit and moves like this will only delegitimize our military even more. I’m sure they’ll always be able to find goons to wield guns, but it will cease to be a respectable career path for all but the most right-wing citizenry.

          It’s not all bad.

      • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The US can not be trusted with its own military.

        I’m not a fan of U.S. foreign policy. But as far as the military chain of command, it’s specifically designed to have it’s own checks and balances against abuse of power. Precisely what Trump is wanting to topple. So if the choice is an orange toddler or a robust and effective circle of generals, I’ll go with the generals thanks.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Those checks and balances didn’t stop them from butchering a million Iraqis.

          An orange toddler breaks his toys. Fuck em

          • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I don’t disagree, but that’s not really my point.

            What you’re arguing is basically akin to people who sat out the vote because “Genocide Joe”. Which is what gave America Trump 2.0 in the first place. Yes, the established Military Complex is flawed and in some cases downright evil. But the response to that isn’t “fuck it, let’s burn it down and give a fucking toddler direct control of it.”

            You don’t fix things by picking the worse option on purpose. That’s utter lunacy.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              It’s not flawed, it’s been working exactly as it was intended our entire lives. Unless you were alive for WW2, the purpose of the military has been to spread misery and death. I’d call it one of the most evil institutions in the face of the Earth.

              I’m not optimistic. Trump won’t be allowed to destroy the military. He will weaken it, though, and that can only be a good thing.

              Hence, saving the world from the Pentagon.

              • krashmo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Trump won’t be allowed to destroy the military. He will weaken it, though, and that can only be a good thing.

                Real 1930s Germany vibes coming out today

                • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  I’ve read a lot of stuff on the development of the military industrial complex in Germany and fascism’s relationship to it both while it was gaining power and had power and I’m not seeing any parallels, could you explain?

            • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              You don’t fix things by picking the worse option on purpose.

              That’s exactly what the electorate just did.

              That’s utter lunacy.

              I fully agree

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      What country did you serve for? AFAIK, the US is one of a handful of countries that don’t have a law stating that soldiers are obligated to refuse unlawful orders and to report those who gave those orders.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        57 minutes ago

        It’s generally called a “duty to disobey,” and is empowered by the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The UCMJ is more concerned about the need to obey orders, but specifies the conditions when military personnel may feel justified in not following them:

        If the order is “contrary to the constitution” or “the laws of the United States.”

        If the order is “patently illegal, … such as one that directs the commission of a crime.”

        https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/what-is-a-military-duty-to-disobey/

        • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 minutes ago

          Appreciate it, I remember reading many years ago that after WW2, most countries agreed to sign into law that soldiers were legally obligated to disobey unlawful orders and report the person who gave the order to their superiors, but that the US was one of the nations that didn’t.

          But a quick search brings up nothing but articles talking about what you posted, so I can’t find any info on it. I wonder if in other countries it’s enshrined outside of military law, and that’s the distinction? I have no clue.

    • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      This guy seemed to be campaigning on not prosecuting war criminals, so military lawyers might be the first ones with difficult decisions to make.

  • Ab_intra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    It baffels me that the american people are so stupid to elect him a second time. And this time, like we see, there is not going to be guardrails agains him. He is only picking yes men. It wouldn’t supprise me if Pentagon tries to get him killed before he get to the oval office.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That would shock me. Sane people in power might piss and moan about him, but they never actually do anything about it.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I genuinely believe that the ideological divide is far too wide in the US to be able to say that “America” believes this or that.

    • finderscult@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s not stupidity, it was a clear option between something the American people know does not work, and something that might work.

      If the Biden/Harris status quo continued, beyond the genocide and other awfulness, the median American would die from COVID or other such disease at their desk at work in their 80s while still stressing about how 2/3rds their 5 figure paycheck goes to rent and 1/3rd goes to their 1200 kcal/day diet.

      Maybe Trump fixes it, maybe Trump ends it, but that above ever enshittificated scenario does not happen.

      It’s like making a meth empire when you’re diagnosed with stage 4 cancer while poor. Best case scenario is better than the best case scenario in the alternative choices.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        t’s not stupidity, it was a clear option between something the American people know does not work, and something that might work.

        There is no reasonable expectation that Trump would “work” for anyone outside of some very wealthy and grifters. So, yes, voting for Trump is stupid.

        Accelerationists can fuck off.

        • finderscult@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Well there is no reasonable expectation that voting for Harris improves anything given her explicit statement she’s going to be just Biden in a wig.

          When you present unreasonable choices, you get unreasonable decisions. To most people Trump isn’t the ultra competent, ultra intelligent, ultra evil fascist you guys have been propagandizing him as for the last decade.

          He’s an incompetent version of a generic politician.

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            54 minutes ago

            “would you rather have nothing to eat, or poison?”

            If you eat nothing, maybe you can figure out a better solution with your remaining time. If you eat poison, you’re probably going to be too sick (or dead) to improve things.

            Trump is poison.

            Also Biden did improve some things, so it’s less “nothing” and more “some crackers”. Sure, a full meal would be better.

            • finderscult@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 minutes ago

              That’s not the choice, especially if you’re Muslim or poor. The choice is the same cyanide you’ve been taking, but a higher dose; or arsenic.

              Biden improved nothing for the working class, and has been actively hostile to Muslims.

              Your false choice and inability to see how much people are suffering is why you lost, why your messaging just doesn’t resonate and infact turns people off of your party.

              Most people care about their own survival and life. That’s it. If your corpo is hurting them as much or worse than the other corporate is hurting them, they’ll simply not choose your corpo to give power to.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Well there is no reasonable expectation that voting for Harris improves anything given her explicit statement she’s going to be just Biden in a wig.

            That’s not true!

            She promised to be different by appointing Republicans🤣

          • Beryl@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I don’t think anyone but himself ever called Trump ultra intelligent or ultra competent

            • finderscult@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Really? Dems have been saying he’s going to dismantle the US, completely use the US military to eliminate his political opponents, that he has pages on pages of plans to change the US into a dictatorship and stop all future elections while eliminating the US Constitution. I mean really Dems have been attributing to him this massive grand plan that would require a master manipulator operating completely perfectly to accomplish.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Man I still can’t believe America greenlit this reality show for another four seasons. Between this and DOGE, the scripts getting a bit too on the nose.

  • Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Critical support to comrade Trump in his heroic struggle to destroy the genocidal amerikkkan empire from within 🫡