twotone@beehaw.org to Technology@beehaw.org · edit-21 year agoWhich is your preferred smartwatch/fitness tracker?www.tomsguide.comexternal-linkmessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1124arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1124arrow-down1external-linkWhich is your preferred smartwatch/fitness tracker?www.tomsguide.comtwotone@beehaw.org to Technology@beehaw.org · edit-21 year agomessage-square92fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarejabib (he/him)@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year agoPretty sure my Garmin does pace for cycling. You bed to get a multisport watch from them first. The Forerunner watches are going to be focused on running obviously. Fenix line should do average speed
minus-squareowf@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoThat’s not the Vivoactive cycling app.
minus-squareowf@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoThey were Vivoactives. They had pace, not average speed. Regardless of what the focus of the watch is, the cycling app should show cycling stats. It’s incredibly low effort to get something so basic wrong.
minus-squarejabib (he/him)@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoSeems like your post was incredibly low effort, as the Vivoactive (all the way back to the blocky original) supported speed fields. https://averagejoecyclist.com/how-to-use-garmin-vivoactive-3-record-bike-ride/
Pretty sure my Garmin does pace for cycling. You bed to get a multisport watch from them first. The Forerunner watches are going to be focused on running obviously. Fenix line should do average speed
That’s not the Vivoactive cycling app.
They were Vivoactives. They had pace, not average speed.
Regardless of what the focus of the watch is, the cycling app should show cycling stats.
It’s incredibly low effort to get something so basic wrong.
Seems like your post was incredibly low effort, as the Vivoactive (all the way back to the blocky original) supported speed fields.
https://averagejoecyclist.com/how-to-use-garmin-vivoactive-3-record-bike-ride/