- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Anyone that thought AI was never going to be used militarily is a fool. The only question was “How soon?”
It already is. Autonomous systems have been around for a while.
Soon soon.
[booing]
Dollar signs cha-chinging wildly
“What is thy bidding, my master?”
It’s a disaster! Skywalker we’re after!
What if he could be turned to the dark side?
He will join us or die!
We got death star, we got death star! We got death star, we got death star! We got death star, we got death star!
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://m.piped.video/watch?v=Ij4w7ChpuaM
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
whoops human made horrors beyond our comprehension
If it gets out of hand just ask it to play tic tac toe.
A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?
What is my purpose?
This is the best summary I could come up with:
OpenAI this week quietly deleted language expressly prohibiting the use of its technology for military purposes from its usage policy, which seeks to dictate how powerful and immensely popular tools like ChatGPT can be used.
“We aimed to create a set of universal principles that are both easy to remember and apply, especially as our tools are now globally used by everyday users who can now also build GPTs,” OpenAI spokesperson Niko Felix said in an email to The Intercept.
Suchman and Myers West both pointed to OpenAI’s close partnership with Microsoft, a major defense contractor, which has invested $13 billion in the LLM maker to date and resells the company’s software tools.
The changes come as militaries around the world are eager to incorporate machine learning techniques to gain an advantage; the Pentagon is still tentatively exploring how it might use ChatGPT or other large-language models, a type of software tool that can rapidly and dextrously generate sophisticated text outputs.
While some within U.S. military leadership have expressed concern about the tendency of LLMs to insert glaring factual errors or other distortions, as well as security risks that might come with using ChatGPT to analyze classified or otherwise sensitive data, the Pentagon remains generally eager to adopt artificial intelligence tools.
Last year, Kimberly Sablon, the Pentagon’s principal director for trusted AI and autonomy, told a conference in Hawaii that “[t]here’s a lot of good there in terms of how we can utilize large-language models like [ChatGPT] to disrupt critical functions across the department.”
The original article contains 1,196 words, the summary contains 254 words. Saved 79%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
This is the best summary I could come up with:
We cooked.
So… Don’t Be Evil 2.0
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
There’s still a bunch of nukes swimming around. I don’t think AI is a humanity-wiping level threat so much as it is a way of dehumanizing conflicts.
We should let AI control the nukes too
Removed by mod
Evidence?
Removed by mod