I found this its the cheapest 10TB Exos drive on Newegg and looking to buy 4 of them. I will be putting them in my NAS that I use for my media library and pc backups. The price I’m posting this is $130, I’m also looking similar Exos drives that are $250 is there a difference? Should I shell up for the more expensive drives?

  • TCB13@lemmy.worldEnglish
    33·
    10 months ago

    That should be a choice of the OS / controller card not of the drive itself. Also what datacenter wants to run drives that don’t report half of the SMART data just because they felt like it?

    • Victor@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      10 months ago

      Not implementing stuff that is uninteresting to the target consumer shouldn’t come as strange to people.

      The strange thing would be marketing the product towards the wrong consumer group.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nlEnglish
      36·
      10 months ago

      Data centers replace drives when they fail and that’s about it. They don’t care much about SMART data.

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        10·
        10 months ago

        We used to use smart data to predict when to order new drives and on really bad looking days increase our redundancy. Nothing like getting a bad series of drives for PB of data to make you paranoid I guess.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nlEnglish
          3·
          10 months ago

          What kind of attributes did you find relevant? I imagine the 19x codes…

          I’ve read the Blackblaze statistics and I’m using a tool (Scrutiny) that takes those stats into account for computing failure probability, but at the end of the day the most reliable tell is when a drive gets kicked out of an array (and/or can’t pass the long smart test anymore).

          Meanwhile, I have drives with “lesser” attributes sitting on warning values (like command timeout) and ofc I monitor them and have good drives on standby, but they still seem to chug along fine for now.