Oh no think of all the taxes they suddenly won’t be paying.

/S

According to Wikipedia this is somehow acceptable and common. It needs to be detectible to the human eye that contact is lost.

Which seems like such a horseshit rule.

Norway is in Nato…

Thanks, and your math makes sense, but I think this is a misinterpretation by op. It’s fair to say that as a percentage of expenditure… But not tax dollars.

Social security gets complicated because it’s set up as a trust fund and has investments that grow to support disbursement rates. It also means that the expenditures should be carved out, same as the inbound tax. This should shift the calculations meaningfully.

Oh cool you live in old Denmark?

But Massachusetts has snowy winters and icy conditions which means they need to salt the roads. This is not something that they have to contend with in check notes Sweden?

/S

Source?

It’s art both in paintings and the buildings architecture. The spire was one of the most well known in Copenhagen.

It’s also the loss of the primary trading floor from when it was an active exchange (At least from what I was able to gather.).

That’s all well and good, but their showers will be longer

Completely agree. It’s also a word that you cannot infer the importance of the post or their responsibilities. With things like Chancellor, Supreme Overlord, Premier, etc.

Too Good to go, but with weaponry.

The way this whole thing went down is absurd.

That said, I had an underperforming colleague who never picked up that feedback was negative. They only latched onto the positive statements. This is either a failing of the receiver to hear the negative when also getting positives or a failing of the feedback giver to be direct.

It’s impossible to say in this situation, though it caught my attention that she mentioned she was close to closing a deal and lost it last second. If we take the CEOs statement at face value, perhaps she didn’t actually meet their metrics.

I can’t say if this is justified or not, but what is abundantly obvious to me is 1) their feedback system likely sucks 2) the hit squad was under prepared with the justification for a termination for lack of performance, 3) she called them on their shit justifiably.

I also agree that it should be expected they give a reasonable severance if this is their hiring model… If you by rule whack people.after three months, they should compensate for another three as people were not looking for new work.

This is not slander. It would be slander/libel if they went out and proclaimed she sucked at her job with nothing tl back it up.

I don’t think infrastructure would be the limiting factor. Looks like Germany is 20k short of their target.

Denmark, for instance, still has compulsory service. However, it is only enacted if they have fewer volunteers than their target, and will only compel participation up to the limit. Denmark has not needed to compel anyone to join in quite a long time, fortunately.

That said, under a similar model, Germany would only need to add 20,000. Likely less per year depending on the commitment term. Eg 10k/year if they are conscripted for 2 years. Also assuming that volunteer attrition and signups offset each other.

the bigger issue is about the moral justification of forcing someone into military service in the 21st century.

Eminent domain is subjected to legal challenges. Both to the authority (there must be a purpose) and also to the FMV assessment. Which costs money. And time.

If it was as easy as snapping their fingers, it would’ve happened.

… That’s the joke

You would make a great bot parent one day.

Didn’t say it was or that I wanted to.

And as with people, the obese don’t set age records

The crux of it isn’t whether the law applies or not, it’s whether the law should exist or not.

I argue the law is dumb or should have an expriy window of 50 years or whatever.

If they really wanted it, they should have found it themselves.