The craziest part is that this is only happening in Islamic countries and absolutely not happening in the West.

I’ve seen the right redefine woke and legislate it on a whim to prosecute political enemies, what’s stopping the opposition from using this law against you or I?

The world is more complex than that, and I’m sure you know it.

It just seems performative and works against your other point. It would be nice to flip a magic switch and get rid of Nazism, but at the same time, you’re right that you can’t just decide what free speech is allowed and what is when it comes to this. I get it for words or phrases that cause immediate danger like, bomb, fire, etc.

Everything else is a slippery slope, especially given how creative our supreme court is (US)

This is not the correct way to do this.

This is the right take, and the fact that these people aren’t seeing it is insane.

I’m pretty sure it’s the most documented war of all time by now, we’d know. The Israeli war is much younger and it was readily apparent when the war crimes started. I’m pretty sure that’s why a lot of countries like to go dark from the internet when they kick up their bullshit.

Why would this be different from right now? If they could feasibly end the war they way, they absolutely would, and id absolutely condone it.

Y’all are thinking pretty small, Putin won’t just have a free pass about us aid, Putin has a pass to our entire structure. Their military might be shit but their Intel apparatus is not at all.

I’m not digging, but why do you know so much? Got something fun for us to read?

Well then do you want the job?

No, I’m not doing “an immigrants job.”

Why are we like this?

Scrambling,??? Like they just accidentally found themselves aiding on their front lines? Journalism is dead.

This is exactly that

I can see why for both, thanks for taking the time!

it do, but it hurts

someone asked a question and the only response was

“man page”

thats really cool, that was 8 years ago too, anything recent with the project?

Thanks for explaining that, I’d agree with those changes. I’m cool with housing be a commodity, but only if we don’t have homeless people and it’s affordable. We don’t have either.

Renting sucks not good butt. What you’ve just put together looks like an argument for someone who works in real estate law, or on behalf of some government institution dealing with property.

Make it make sense for all of us. You wanna know why computers don’t work well enough? I’ll let you know, but I’m sure you don’t wanna.

Make this make sense.

Post links that can teach us, and if you don’t, I’ll send you down the rabbit-hole that is Microsoft support forums.

Agreed, I didn’t comment to say you’re wrong, just more so “you’re right and” and it looks like you did the same.

Keep spreading the word.

You’re right, that is what the law says.

But never ever forget, the law is meant to protect people with property first, protect property second, and protect people without property third.

Lastly, police are not at all required to protect anyone, much less follow the law.