equivalent to one in every £3 spent.
Why not just say that ⅓ of money spent was on contracts that had red flags? That’s what they mean, but they’re trying to make it sound more damning and speaking nonsense.
Journalists and numbers is a bad mix.
On the topic of the actual story, I’m not surprised. When are we going to bring a case?
“learn Rust” in this case is learn it to a level where all of the little behaviour around cross language integrations are understood and security flaws won’t be introduced. Expert level.
It’s not “I did a pet project over the weekend”.