They won’t. They’ll just substitute them. The idea is trying to force every company do the same thing, as making people work locally makes them more dependent on their local company and less likely to jump to a better job.

Then you can lower salaries (not rise them) and destroy benefits. Also you can enforce dress codes to make it look like a dictatorship country like North Korea.

Did this woman do it on purpose? The judge seems to be pretty sorry.

People in 2021 had to go and do stuff, infected or not. That makes me scared that some day I might get charged for murder by pure chance that my neighbor got infected while I was buying my covid test.

Is that American hand writing? It reminds me so much of James Hetfield’s, and basically no one writes like that in my country.

Arch Linux. All the software at their latest version (which is usually the best one), within a couple of commands, either from the huge official repos or the AUR.

One of the reasons surely is that it’s getting banned from government software 😅

Or you can preinstall micro like you preinstall everything else 😅

And all the shortcuts are SANE, not the weird thing of nano

In every post of this kind I am amazed at so many people using nano instead of micro which is SO MUCH BETTER while being the same thing at the same time.

AI doesn’t do feelings

How can I have a serious conversation with these annoying answers? Come on, you know what I am talking about. Even an AI chatbot would know what I mean.

Any AI chatbot, even “general purpose” ones will read your code and will return a description of what it does if you ask it.

And particularly AI would be great at catching “useless”, “weird” or unexplainable code in a repository. Maybe not with the current levels of context. But that’s what I want to know, if these tools (or anything similar) exist yet.

Thank you.

Of course, 100% reliability is impossible even with human reviewers. I just want a tool that gives me at least something, cause I don’t have the time or knowledge to review a full repo before executing it on my machine.

I just want a report that says “we detected in line 27 or file X, a particular behavior that feels weird as it tries to upload your environment variables into some unexpected URL”.

I don’t care if the solution is AI based or not, indeed.

I guess I thought it like that because AI is quite fit for the task of understanding what might be the purpose of code in a few seconds/minutes without you having to review it. I don’t know how some non-AI tool could be better for such task.

Edit: so many people against the idea. Have you guys used GitHub Copilot? It understands the context of your repo to help you write the next thing… Right? Well, what if you apply the same idea to simply review for malicious/unexpected behaviour on third party repos? Doesn’t seem too weird for me.

I am a fan of Python’s or Rust’s official conventions.

For package names, tho, I don’t get why this-is-used over this_clearly_better_system, as I would expect a double click to select_the_whole_thing, whereas it does-not-happen-here.

It is a project! All games are, 😅, just follow the instructions from the README. You’ll be solving Rust exercises on your preferred editor, and get some feedback from a terminal window. It’s great.

The thing is that, in C the API could be slightly different and you could get terrible crashes, for example because certain variables were freed at different times, etc.

In Rust that is literally impossible to happen unless you (very extremely rarely) need to do something unsafe, which is explicitly marked as such and will never surprise you with an unexpected crash.

Everything is so strongly typed that if it compiles… It will run without unexpected crashes. That’s the difference with C code, and that’s why Rust is said to be safe. Memory leaks, etc, are virtually impossible.

Everything is better in Rust. Faster, safer… And also the developer experience is amazing with cargo.

The problem here is not Rust, it’s the humans, it seems.

The dependencies are set manually, of course, and the dev was enforcing something too strict, it seems, and that is causing headaches.

But, as the debian dude has learned… Rust programs will 99.999 % work if they can be compiled.

I just wish every programmer completed the rustlings game/tutorial. Doesn’t take that long.

I didn’t even fully complete it, and it made me a way better programmer, because it forces you to think RIGHT.

It may sound weird for people who haven’t experienced it, but it’s amazing when you get angry at the compiler and you realise… It is right, and you were doing something that could f*ck you up 2 months in the future.

And after a bit of practise, it starts wiring your brain differently, and now my Python code looks so much better and it’s way more safe just because of those days playing around in rustlings.

So yeah, Rust is an amazing language for everything, but particularly for kernel development. Either Linux implements it, or it’ll probably die in 30 years and get replaced with a modern Rust kernel (Redox OS?).

So my mom shouldn’t use GNU/Linux because she can’t fix bugs?

Oh I am very sorry, I think I did not express myself properly. I wasn’t particularly referring to you, but rather the typical user who will answer to the “Musk is one of the richest” with the “company value” thing.

I do think tho that whatever your opinion on Musk’s companies is, the market clearly thinks otherwise, which banks are part of it.

Also, I strongly dislike Musk. But it’s very clear to me that he has enough power to do whatever he wants like wasting lots of money trying new things until something sticks.

He might not be now, but like a year ago he was the richest human ever. I don’t think he’s fallen from the top 20. And that is just the official numbers. Imagine what might be hidden.

And don’t come to me with the “but shares are not money”. Shares are basically money, and you can even use them to convince banks to give you more.