Response to citizens losing homes is funneling their dwindling reserves of money to insurance companies. Wonder who besides insurance companies and those they bribe thinks this is a good idea?
Response to citizens losing homes is funneling their dwindling reserves of money to insurance companies. Wonder who besides insurance companies and those they bribe thinks this is a good idea?
guess this one needed the /s homie. Oh well i gotchoo
I can’t really argue with that logic but in this case you’re talking to OP! They probably don’t think this is less evil than anything seeing how they posted this knowhatimsayin?
He’s been waiting longer than ash to win but he became team rocket to do it
use your head my illustrious homie.
Another Zionist huh? Into the blocklist with the rest.
it’s never too late to fix a terrible mistake. Besides, Israel is younger than Biden
The real shame is the kidnapped and tortured oxygen forced to give him breath.
I’m kinda worried how the piece keeps naming the vloggers and hinting that they are doing China’s dirty work. Sure it says there’s no evidence they’re Chinese agents but it DOES name these vloggers, characterizes their vids for us, and heavily implies they are spreading misinfo. A headcase skimming the article could get the wrong idea and try to hurt these folks, and headcases are usually skimmers
But you can rest smuggly
Finally getting you drop your red herring and fall back on your modus operandi of ad hominem was honestly the best outcome i could ask for on the Internet, yes.
Considering mcDs is moving towards prison labor now i absolutely believe they’ve at least deliberately crafted a hiring policy that allows for this and other abuses of labor and law.
here is a nice writeup on red herring and even tips on how to use it more effectively than you’ve been. The first important thing is understanding the term.
I’ll help you over this hill youre lyin’ on… Your actual argument from the beginning is that “Israel as a state entity should continue to exist.”
Your “red herring’s” purpose is to obfuscate your final position (Israel as a state should continue, simply because it’s already there.)
By diverting attention towards how difficult it could be logistically, you hide from the immorality of israel’s existence.
My OG reply simultaneously dismisses your “ok but how?” argument as fallacious and addresses your real point, “israel should exist”. If you actually think israel should exist as an ethnostate someplace, i actually think your country should host them and you should move out so they can have it.
You have not done anything since except complain how its not fair i ignored your bad faith.
Can you please take a little more care in your next response?
Incorrect. Israel should cease to exist ==mean jew elimination no matter how hard or often you say it. Its frankly appalling you dont get this.
Israel should cease to exist. It never should have existed, and what it deserves is dissolution. Your insulting followup “questions” are based on your personal feelings and are a red herring no matter how strong your feelings are.
Seriously, go look up red herring before you forget.
Yeah the press’ve been claiming it’s dying for 40+ years. y’all… It’s dead
Im dancing around what i hoped youd eventually figure out: to be clear, i really don’t respect your ridiculous red herring)
Go look up red herring, realize how silly you just looked and improve your debate skills.
Elsewhere.
But I have the feeling that you are answering like this cause you simply refuse to say the quiet part out loud, or are to cowardly to come out and say it
Every accusation is a confession
If your question wasn’t a flippant and dismissive response to my position, then neither was my answer.
I think if we’re following history and making a point we should put new israel on top of your home. No problem right?
Well, i’m just goin by how insurance ends up working in the us so take it for what it’s worth. Problem is for-profit insurance companies in the States are so badly regulated they are denying the very claims they exist to pay. You are right that people need help and i didn’t really offer an alternative. If you pressed me on how, i guess i’d advocate govt. assistance for disaster relief as a superior choice. It would be far better for citizens money to be spent on taxes towards this than to a private company. How do i know this? I don’t, but my experience how private insurance “serves” me and people i know here in the land of the free couldn’t be fuckin worse.