IPv6 binds on wildcard addresses include binding to the IPv4 addresses.

What does ss -tlnp return? Does the process listen on any ports?

That should only affect ports below 1024.

Your two bind addresses might be in conflict with each other since [::]:5234 includes binding to the first one.

Or, you know, not that crazy after all if germ can survive that process.

Python packaging and stability is a total mess. It has gotten to the point where I just look for alternative tools when I find out something new I found is written in Python.

You want https://tabby.tabbyml.com/ instead of tabby.ml

Mainly because people who are anti-immigrant moan about “unbearable” rates of immigration at immigration rates far below 1% of the existing population and have prejudices like the ones in your comment about immigrants being criminals or replacing the local culture or language even at those comparatively low numbers.

That is mainly because the fear of migration tends to sound completely bat shit crazy when put into words, at least at the levels that aren’t related to climate change making large parts of Earth’s warm and dry regions uninhabitable.

That title seems phrased wrong, are you sure you don’t mean something like

True purpose of program claiming to fight climate change in developing nations uncovered: funneling billions of dollars back to rich countries

The concept of sovereign states is generally considered to be established in the Peace of Westphalia in 1648. Of course the US did not exist at the time but it was a concept established as International Law before it was founded. Of course most treaties of this kind weren’t signed by nearly the same percentage of nations they are today.

Probably closer to 130 years starting with their invasion of Hawaii and then involvement in coups in South America and the Middle East.

the info required was there already, just you needed to put effort in

Not really. This is mostly what this is all about. The companies are insisting that open source projects should do analysis of security impacts in addition to fixing the bugs whenever some “security researcher” runs some low effort fuzzing or static analysis thing that produces large numbers of bug reports and assigns CVEs to them without the consent of the project. The problem is that such an impact analysis is significant effort (often orders of magnitude more than the fix itself) by people with deep knowledge about the code bases and only really useful to the customers of those companies who want to selectively update instead of just applying all the latest fixes.

While true essentially forking the latest stable version of the kernel to make an LTS branch or a vendor version only multiplies the problem, it also does not contribute to solving it.

Haven’t used it myself but you could give https://rustdesk.com/ a try.

Yeah, ideally a way that doesn’t leak out of pretty much anything like hydrogen does.

There’s almost no resale value.

That is not an EV thing, that is a new, rapidly developing technology thing.

Do you think no one involved in any of those projects has realised that it’s not possible to store hydrogen?

You say that as if it is completely ridiculous but have you seen how many companies jumped onto impractical technologies like the hyperloop or self-driving cars or even replacing half their workforce with LLM-based AIs?

Counterpoint, most of the world does not have access to “middle of nowhere” regions with lots of sunlight, that is just Australia and a few places near major deserts.

Tesla isn’t really a major car company in the transitional sense since they didn’t exist at all as a pre-EV car company.