Context is anti semitic

It’s sarcasm the way I’m reading it, i.e. he is saying the the UN chief is providing context and that is being deemed as antisemitic, which it’s not.

The Israeli ambassador is conflating the state with the entire set of Jewish people, which as you said is itself antisemitic

I think you’re both on the same page

No, equating all Jewish people with the oppressive apartheid state Israel

Where did he say (or equate) all Jewish people?

Genocide

Removed by mod

I don’t think anyone is mad at her, people are looking at this and seeing naked corrupt authoritarianism.

So to explain my confusion, not wanting things to progress is something I don’t understand, so when you said progressive I then thought you were saying Greta is doing good.

Fundementally, being against progression means you are regressive. I think being static isn’t something well defined, because it doesn’t seem feasible, it would required being entirely insular, i.e. solipsistic, which is mad.

If you don’t mind me asking, why do you want things to regress? In recent times ( bar the rise of the far right ideologies causing a fair bit of war and death), it’s statistically been one of the most peaceful periods in history, bar some notable regions, really Europe’s stopped brutally annihilating each other. Arguably, this has been due to global cooperation on an economic and cultural level, it could be nuclear weapons as well, but cooperation is good, so I would personally roll with it.

Would you prefer to go back to a time when countries where more insular and thus more likely to end up in war with each other? Or what other benefits do you see in being regressive?

I think I maybe mistook the tone of your comment.

I think Greta is in a position to make a difference and amazingly in a non violent way. So when you said you far left activitist etc… It came across as the typical brain washed drivel you get from people who have been taken over and are being driven by snake oil salesmen that appear to have taken over general public discourse globally.

You’re response, saying you think far left as progressive makes me think I was harsh in thinking this as I do think Greta is progressive, which I think is idionatically correct, however I don’t think Greta’s stance or activism is far anything so that is where my confusion came from.

What the fuck does far left mean to you

Suprising for the BBC, they usually ignore protests that go against establishment interests. Greta is doing great work.

You will be able to return to Gaza only when another announcement permitting it is made

So maybe never then?

If only society was designed around looking after people instead of infinite competition, maybe this wouldn’t be so much of a problem

Yes, not stupid, just do the right thing you say…

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/conservative-party-conference-15-minute-cities-mark-harper-conspiracy/

🤔

I’d like to think they’re not completely stupid.

Why?

I found khan academy to be really good. My daughter handled the JavaScript module pretty well at the age of 9. If your son is already familiar with the concept of programming and can read well enough, I’d be pretty sure he’d enjoy this

https://www.khanacademy.org/computing/computer-programming

No, just completely devoid of morals. He’s positioning himself to have something to battle labour with. Conservative voters are very easily triggered by suggesting someone might be taking something from them. Doesn’t matter how stupid it is, conservatives are incredibly easily led, selfish idiots.