Which is clearly necessary, and companies know it.

Open any MMO built and organized around a player economy (designed by a for-profit corporation) and you will see they know that individual wealth can upset the balance of the game.

They set maximum currency values, or they charge you periodic taxes for existing in the server.

When people are being honest about wealth, we all know the concentration of wealth in the extreme fucks up the system for everybody.

And video game systems do not even have a scarcity problem like the real world.

This seems to directly contradict the claims of the actual Hamas statements we are looking at right now.

Interesting that you can pick and choose which Hamas leader statements to believe in forming this narrative. Also, it is a little ironic that you claim others are engaging in bad faith while you manipulate which statements are valid from the same source.

Right? Nazi zionist goes to a Holocaust protest and gets punched.

Is the news about how kind the people were to him?

Similar boat, except my wife actually got hooked on FO76 a couple of months back and loved it.

I skip a lot of adaption shows or remakes, so she basically forced me to start it, but I wound up really enjoying it. We’re trying not to binge it all in a day, so I’m only halfway through, but I look forward to watching it.

Imagine living your life letting reddit be your filter for meaningful experience lmao.

Touch grass guy.

Okay, professor. What is the exact maximum people are allowed to earn and exist in high expense areas?

It’s called “passing a bunch of money around at the top.”

You think earning less than 100k is in the top earning block lmao.

They shouldn’t let people this dumb comment.

How about instead of tearing down something, you post something of substance.

How much do you earn? What do you do? How much is your rent?

And what is the maximum amount people are allowed to earn before they can criticize expensive living

Removed by mod

I see a lot of MMOs being recommended, but I find them to be either shallow in combat or predatory unless you are seeking MMO specific things, so I’m going to point at single player/coop stuff.

Bethesda has a large selection of open world games, but I pretty much assume people have played all of them (Elder Scrolls / Fallout games).

If you are okay with going outside of Fantasy, the Far Cry series has some impressive technology in their older titles. Far Cry 2 is a personal favorite, your PC might be able to handle it.

Borderlands series.

The original Dragons Dogma: Dark Arisen holds up. This is probably my best recommendation based on your asks.

Lego Star Wars or the Lego Marvel game.

Fable 1, 2, 3

The Middle Earth Shadow of Mordor / Shadow of War Games were pretty incredible but might be too high-end.

The first Red Dead Redemption might run for you.

Early Dark souls games might run. Maybe 1 or 2.

From here, I would start listing old Star Wars Jedi Knight series games.

I could probably go on, but this is most of the good stuff off the top of my head.

I forgot to add Mass Effect. Great for sci-fi, great leveling, and combat.

I’m stating the difference between an invader and a civilian distinctly.

Your inability to address what I’ve said isn’t my problem.

I dont think I have to answer that to say it is wrong to starve children to death.

Yea, if an invading force is slaughtering people to conquer your home, they are no longer just civilians. They are active combatants.

How many Israeli children starved to death yesterday?

Nazis had children too and didn’t justify the actions of the Nazis.

You don’t counter coping techniques. It’s not a logical stance and will not be countered by logic.

Gish gallop.

You made an absolute out of genocide and then kited right past the fact your original stance was an absolute acceptance of genocide despite the obvious other answers.

You will not stop clawing to justify the genocide, I don’t care to continue debating genocidal nazis.

We call this, projection.

You can’t come to terms with the hate and slaughter you support, so you project your guilt to others.

The implication of your proposition is that only genocide can decide this.

Your assumption is ludicrous and fascist. It says everything that needs to be said about your beliefs. By assuming only bloodshed is the solution, you remove the responsibility for you to face the genocide you are supporting.

I would have a criminal investigation and follow-up to this genocide similar to the Nuremberg Trials.

I want the people responsible locked up for life, and I want freedom for the people of Palestine.

So how about you? Can you honestly answer what exactly you want out of this?

Removed by mod

If you truly believed this, you would be offended by the political use of rape to justify the genocide of children.

You don’t want to engage what my comment actually said, the fact that a single rape in the face of genocide does not an article make.

My comment was about the focus on this crime as an individual act justifying genocide and you want to refocus back to the singular act while not really addressing the editorializing of NYT.

You are playing the game the genocidal people want you to play instead of engaging this propoganda meaningfully.

Civilians don’t typically hang out in occupied territory.