You’re allowed to plug your book Boris.

You’re not allowed to bang on about it for hours. Mention it once , show a copy to the Camera, put it away and move on. It’s the same for everyone else on the telly mate.

The article literally says they’re doing FSD and cheap, together.

What they aren’t doing is Cheap and Human operated.

It’s a choice of Cheap+FSD or Expensive+Human Controlled or FSD. There won’t be a cheap human operated model.

It probably won’t, but the article doesn’t say they’ve dropped FSD like the parent poster implied.

Actually read the article: It’s the exact opposite, they’re still making the FSD version.

They’re not making the version that people can drive.

They smashed her head into the concrete before loading her into the car :(

IRGC is fucked in the head.

No, it’s for safety.

These kids targeted poor Ali as they thought he’d ‘jumped one of their mates’ the week before, if they were allowed out and about, they’d likely kill more of the family in their own revenge scheme.

Removed by mod

From everything I’ve read over time - it’s not even the US that holds a grudge, it’s been popular on both sides of politics to end the embargo.

But neither will since it means losing the massive voting bloc of Cuban-Americans in Florida, Florida itself often being a decider of US elections. They don’t want the embargo to end and anyone who supports ending it losses their vote.

Their reasons seem to vary, from the worst being wealthy land owners who had their lands taken by Castro only wanting relations normalised if they get their land back to the more common escapees who don’t want to normalise relations with the ‘Castro government’ ever, that Cuba needs to ditch the regime first.

She sacrificed herself (really, they smashed her head into concrete before loading her into the car :(, they probably killed her) to send a message. We need to listen. IRGC needs to go.

If the store only exists to make iPhones worse, then yes, that’s the point.

EGS will be full of Chinese Malware in seconds, Epic is owned by TenCent and China is in a war with the west.

Removed by mod

The parts of NATO that aren’t ready to fight are exclusively in the EU.

EU buddied up to Russia for too long and considered US/UK/Poland’s defense buildup bad, now we’re all here.

I just hope the next Australian government will take China seriously.

No but ah… the free money!

In writing, but in reality, almost no one in NATO is ready to fight.

Luckily, neither is Russia.

They’re held for inspections since UNRWA and Iran regularly send weapons to Hamas via ‘aid’ trucks.

It’s why the US needs to keep up the pressure on Israel regarding weapons shipments for aid entering Gaza. It won’t ever speed up the processing of those held up trucks, since they still need to be inspected, but it forces Israel to send their own trucks, with aid they know is good, instead of leaving it to third parties who inevitably adulterate the aid. (That benefits Netanyahu)

Removed by mod

Oligarch: Putin what is going on with the war? Why are we losing?

Putin: Oh wow look, an Eagle, just out there, wow majestic plumage, you should come and see…

Boerewors.

The only way to do that is to completely disable Out-of-order execution to begin with and disable any shared caches, which would completely neuter modern CPUs. Not a little bit, that’s going to be around ~30% of the prior performance - not a 30% loss, a 70% loss…

From ChatGPT- (query: How much performance would a modern Zen 5 or Intel Alder Lake CPU lose if you completely stripped out/disabled SMT, Out of Order Execution and shared caches - operating in-order and only using dedicated (non-shared) caches?)

Stripping out or disabling key performance-enhancing features like Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT), Out-of-Order Execution (OoOE), and shared caches from a modern CPU based on architectures like AMD’s Zen 5 or Intel’s Alder Lake would result in a significant performance loss. Here’s an overview of the potential impact from disabling each feature:

1. Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT)

   Impact: SMT allows a single core to execute multiple threads simultaneously, improving CPU throughput, especially in multi-threaded applications. Disabling SMT would reduce the ability to handle multiple threads per core, decreasing performance for multi-threaded workloads. Expected Loss: Performance drop can be around 20-30% in workloads like video encoding, rendering, and heavily threaded applications. However, single-threaded performance would remain relatively unaffected.

2. Out-of-Order Execution (OoOE)

   Impact: OoOE allows the CPU to execute instructions as resources become available, rather than in strict program order, maximizing utilization of execution units. Disabling OoOE forces the CPU to operate in-order, meaning that it would stall frequently when waiting for data dependencies or slower operations, like memory access. Expected Loss: This could lead to performance drops of 50% or more in general-purpose workloads because modern software is optimized for OoOE processors. Tasks like complex branching, memory latency hiding, and speculative execution would suffer greatly.

3. Shared Caches (L2, L3)

   Impact: Shared caches (particularly L3 caches) help reduce memory latency by sharing frequently accessed data among multiple cores. Disabling shared caches would increase memory access latency, causing more frequent trips to slower main memory. Expected Loss: Performance could drop by 15-30% depending on the workload, especially for applications that benefit from high cache locality, such as database operations, scientific simulations, and gaming.

4. Operating In-Order Only with Dedicated Caches

   Overall Impact: Without OoOE and SMT, and with only in-order execution and dedicated caches, the CPU would be much less efficient at handling multiple tasks and hiding latency. Modern CPUs rely heavily on OoOE to keep execution units busy while waiting for slow memory operations, so forcing in-order execution would significantly stall the CPU. Expected Loss: Depending on the workload, the overall performance degradation could be upwards of 70-80%. Some specialized applications that rely on high parallelism and efficient cache usage might perform even worse.

Summary of Overall Performance Impact:

• Single-threaded tasks: May see performance drop by 50-70% depending on reliance on OoOE and cache efficiency.

• Multi-threaded tasks: Could experience a combined drop of 70-80%, as the lack of SMT, OoOE, and shared caches compound the inefficiencies.

This hypothetical CPU configuration would essentially mimic designs seen in early microprocessors or microcontrollers, sacrificing the massive parallelism, latency hiding, and overall efficiency that modern architectures provide. The performance would be more in line with processors from a couple of decades ago, despite the higher clock speeds and core counts.

Case in point, it’s not feasible, if you’re looking for that in your own computer, you can do it already. I doubt anyone will follow you though.

Probably Russia trying more global terrorism.

But they’ll fail since they still think the best Beaches going are Bondi and Surfers Paradise.