Question: What is it about spiders that you think generates that ick factor in people?
The mess of webs they leave behind and how you constantly have to pay attention to every surface you put weight on lest you end up with a splotch of spider guts to clean up.
It’s not pointless. Depending on where you live, there’s a good chance you do have an abundance of cheap housing available. They’re just not in desirable locations, so many would opt to either pay extra for the privilege of living in more desirable homes or even living on the streets.
Regarding taxes, I’m talking about those who haven’t previously paid taxes, are not currently paying taxes while living in the area, and have no plans to pay taxes after they leave the area.
How did that work when it came to deciding who gets the more desirable housing versus the less desirable ones? Or those who are not from the area and don’t pay taxes to cover the housing?
I’m pretty sure you mean that you’d like a world with no landlords and not a world where short term housing solutions don’t exist. No rent would imply the latter. Unless you know of a way to do it without paying rent?
Quickly filtering out a subset of them to prioritize so that we get the most value possible out of the time that humans spend on it.
LLMs cannot:
LLMs can
Semantics aside, they’re very different skills that require different setups to accomplish. Just because counting is an easier task than analysing text for humans, doesn’t mean it’s the same it’s the same for a LLM. You can’t use that as evidence for its inability to do the “harder” tasks.
Sounds to me like a 50% improvement over zero human eyes.
It certainly would be. Thankfully, there’s many more than zero human eyes involved in this.
Considering that it’s a language task, LLMs exist, and the cost, it’s a reasonable assumption. It’d be pretty silly to analyse a bag of words when you have tools you can use with minimal work with much better results. Even sillier to spend over $200 for something that can be run on a decade old machine in a few hours.
Why not both?
Volume is only useful for things that are non-compressible (i.e. fluid). What if you’re measuring flour? Usually, the measurements are given for sifted flour, but that’s not something you would know unless you’re experienced in the kitchen. And even if you do sift your flour, there’s still going to be a lot of variation depending on how much things get compressed again as you’re scooping it out.
As a developer? You’re not going to get very far if you refuse to write websites for the world’s current most popular browser.
Yeah, why encourage people to have more children when you can instead have other countries pay for them and we pick and choose the best to lure in as immigrants?
Who is to say their neighbor didn’t burn her trying to frame the guy? If you aren’t 100% sure then you might be killing innocents. And you can never be 100% sure.
Yep. It’s part of their mating ritual. You can learn more about it at c/fuckcars.
There’s the question of willingness, and then there’s that of ability. A single person acting independently with no prior planning will quickly get shut down, and the world will be no better for it.
Microsoft is working very hard at getting into this data game. Don’t think they won’t try making similar deals.
Are we looking at a future where we need a search engine to tell us which search engine to use for your queries?
This is a problem with the add-on store, not the browser. Do the forks have their own add-on stores? Or do they just use the same one that Mozilla provides? To the best of my knowledge, the only forks that have their own stores are the ones that wouldn’t be able to use Firefox plugins anyway (e.g. Palemoon).
I don’t think forking Firefox is going to change what you see in the add-on store. You would need someone to run their own store. Or just install the plugin manually.
On the flip side, there’s also the people who say that autism is nothing more than a disability that needs to be cured. This is probably what that they were referring to. Both extremes are harmful.