No it really does change what kind of food you desire to eat. It was quite a surreal change for me when I discovered I was craving the juicy taste of a tomato for the first time.

I don’t know if it is normal for others, but I have never ever had the actual desire to eat vegetables before I went on ozempic/wegovy.

Salty sausage, crisps, cheese, bacon, that was the only types of food I used to crave. Now I cannot eat bacon anymore, the fat taste in my mouth makes me queasy.

It’s just not the entire story. Ozempic/wegovy changes the way you feel about food.

I used to always want to eat a lot. And if there was candy on the table within my sight, like 80% of my mental focus would be on that candy, no matter how hard I tried to focus on something else.

Now it’s more like, meh I guess I could take a piece of candy, and then I get lost in talking and forget to actually put it in my mouth until half an hour later.

It is definitely not just appetite suppression. I used to overeat a lot, even after feeling quite a lot of pain from beeing stuffed, I would keep eating. Now I forget to eat, if I don’t have people around me going to lunch.

The soothing, rewarding pleasure of swallowing sugar, fat or salty food I used to need to feel good is just gone most of the time.

To some degree it feels like I have been set free.

I have an app where I register when I take my meds, and which meds.

I make sure to absolutely always tap the app while taking the meds. No taking meds and then going to find the phone, or tapping the app and then take the meds. Always do it simoultaniously.

With that rule in place, I know that I can 100% trust the app in telling me if I have taken them or not.

This works really great for me.

What he means is, your security considerations here must come from some perceived threat. What kind of threat do you forsee that requires this high level of security?

Usually when you consider security you start with a threat model, describing the scenarios you want to protect your systems from. And based on that you decide the necessary technical security measures that are relevant.

Maybe because most mammals don’t menstruate. Only humans and a few others do, like bats and some apes.

Because it has become a faux pas to criticize religion. Religion is something personal and if you criticize it you are offending people personally, and that is forbidden by our recently new social norms.

Did you see the report? Quite a lot of rockets fired from Gaza fails and hit somewhere in Gaza.

There is even a book about it: https://www.amazon.co.uk/All-Cats-Are-Autism-Spectrum/dp/1787754715

Because we destabilise them so they do not develop to powerful societies, that won’t do cheap labour for us anymore.

Mycroft is the closest thing I can think off.

Something must up with that, OP tried to hide it.

Sure. I did not mean to say the extend of them is equal in both countries. Just that neo-Nazism exists in both countries, and we are being blind if we simply ignore that it is a problem in Ukraine and their military.

Oh, there is no doubt Russia is much worse in the fascist regard. What I mean is we are beeing ignorant if we turn a blind to neo-Nazism also beeing a problem in Ukraine.

Especially when we are considering Ukraine joining NATO in the future. We need them to get rid of those parts of the military first.

Some ukranians are neo-nazis, also some in the military. Just like in Russia.

We (Denmark) are donating more than half of the F-16 we got. It severely disables our air force, I sure hope they will make quite a difference.

Nobody is going to choose that option in the EU anyway. TikToks “special” algorithm is what attracts people. The app becomes boring if you disable it, users who try will quickly reenable it again.

TikTok knows this. The option is only to appease EU legislators so they do not outright ban TikTok.

There is some kind of account-wall on Twitter. I have been hit with a popup asking me to sign up or log in plenty of times, in order to be allowed to read the tweets I was trying to read.

So twitter is not allowing everyone to read the tweets without an account.

Pair it with solar panels, then it doesn’t contribute to climate change and you can run it as much as you want when the sun shines.

Hey, I completely agree with you, in that the most interesting discussions are among groups where I don’t agree with everyone. This is where I learn and grow as a person.

But in saying that, aren’t you also saying that some people, like you and me, would not use such a database to filter out the users we do not agree with?

And would it not be a logical conclusion to make, that people who likes to build and stay in their echo chambers, would not be more inclined to listen to different opinions just because they don’t have a more efficient tool to sort out people they disagree with?

What I am saying is, all information that is technically available will be collected and analysed. Better make a public and open platform showing everything, such that everyone can see exactly what can be collected and surmised from the already public information, than to keep users blind from what information they actually leak publically.

Hey, I completely agree with you, in that the most interesting discussions are among groups where I don’t agree with everyone. This is where I learn and grow as a person.

But in saying that, aren’t you also saying that some people, like you and me, would not use such a database to filter out the users we do not agree with?

And would it not be a logical conclusion to make, that people who likes to build and stay in their echo chambers, would not be more inclined to listen to different opinions just because they don’t have a more efficient tool to sort out people they disagree with?

What I am saying is, all information that is technically available will be collected and analysed. Better make a public and open platform showing everything, such that everyone can see exactly what can be collected and surmised from the already public information, than to keep users blind from what information they actually leak publically.