So you simply think they can starve however many civilians they want, most of whom are children, because it hurts Hamas?

So you ignore the question?

You know what would actually put a dent in illegal immigration? Fixing their country that we broke. They come here because being undocumented and working under the table with potentially dangerous conditions is better than their home country. Maybe we shouldn’t have destabilized so many democracies in South America.

Oh, so you checked up with every person who said they’d move and you personally know that they didn’t?

Huh, I didn’t know that Ukraine was trying to take over Russia and that Russia was in danger of not existing anymore.

Isn’t it sad that you ignore that the Republican presidents didn’t close gitmo either and that Trump actually increased the drone strikes?

What I’ve seen in this thread is people asking for evidence. If it really could have been Hamas or the another Palestinian group, don’t you think they’d be bombing the shit out of Israel? Until there’s real proof one way or the other, all we have is he said/she said.

O…k… And? Anyone can make a documentary and anyone can say stuff. I’m very confused as to how this is proof.

No… I’m pretty sure the point was that Canada is still doing something right.

No, they’re not just asking questions. They’re also making statements and seemingly implying that only people who fully transition are transgender and every trans person must also identify as male or female because non-binary is a “fad” that people made up and doesn’t really exist.

From the article it seemed that a big criticism of the amendment was that it was too vague. There were people from different political beliefs and some aboriginals who didn’t like how vague it was, though the aboriginals wanted it to further.

Huh, in the US we use it as a term for a violent group of people. Does it not mean that in Australia?

Exactly what part was “misinformation”? Are you trying to say that the celebration wasn’t peaceful?

Public indecency laws are more of a hygiene issue. Making religious clothes or jewelry illegal to wear at school sits very weird with me.

Some people (read those who take “go forth and multiply” literally and as an imperative) absolutely could. However, there is a basis in multiple older cultures in which gay/childless people helped support the society by taking care of the other members’ children and the elderly. Not everything was focused on the individual need to have more kids, but to help those who others had. It is more of a group idea. There’s more than enough children to sustain/grow the population, so it’s more important to have extra hands to care for those who are here.

And there’s tons of other schools who may not reject it. What exactly are you trying to say here with the single word “rejected” and a link?

You’re absolutely right. It’s crazy. But I believe for treason and sedition you have to prove intent. That’s a bit harder. As much as we want to have the hard and fast trial, it has to be done more carefully to make sure it’ll stick.

So what you’re really saying is, you don’t know. You’re assuming.

“The Indian government reports that an average of 34 people were killed annually by tigers in that nation between 2015 and 2018, while the United States has seen only nine fatal cougar attacks since 1980.”

It actually looks like not all that many. Sure, there would be more deaths if there were more tigers, but we could also stop encroaching on their territory and have national parks around the world to protect their habitats. Predators are important to the food chain even if they’re animals that could also attack humans.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/where-lions-and-tigers-and-wolves-attack-and-kill-humans-180981539/

What does this have to do with big cats?