Only if there’s solution you can bring about that isn’t one of the evils.
Only if there’s solution you can bring about that isn’t one of the evils.
You are morally responsible in some degree for 20 people dying rather than 10. Though, in that example, I seriously doubt that most people would think the moral choice is to shoot the 10 people. Probably because we instinctually know that wouldn’t be the end of it or none of the deaths seem inevitable.
Yes, you can. It’s just a trolley problem, and you’re choosing to not flip the switch. It’s still your choice and has consequences.
Except the other option is worse. And you are complicit in whoever wins if you don’t vote at all.
It doesn’t understand .co.uk domains.
Any kind of executive policy to ignore laws works kind of like this. DACA, the lack of federal prosecution for Marijuana, etc. The current administration doesn’t allow it, but you can still face consequences later.
The Windows is not free. The OEMs pay a license fee and that cost is passed on to people buying those computers.
I don’t think anyone here is disputing that it’s a war. They just want an acceptable, concise way to say “the part of the war where Ukraine brought the fighting into Russia.”
I think that predictability is the crux of the surprise about her being charged. I don’t think I could say anything to start national riots. Maybe that isn’t true, but I would never assume that would be the consequences of one of my tweets. Who is this woman that she should have expected she had that kind of influence?
I think a lot of it was the charging network. What happened with that again? Oh yeah. He fired that whole team.
Is the vaccine for this available to most people?
I’m not familiar with mpox and I just finished the gauntlet of vaccines that is a kid’s first year and a half of life.
That comment isn’t saying it was consensual; it’s saying her age is what made it nonconsensual, so you can’t just ignore her age.
If adults talked about having sex, got drunk, and had sex, I don’t think people would generally consider it rape. That one of the people involved was 12 is what makes it absolutely rape and utterly disgusting.
And more expensive than flying a good chunk of the time!
But if you truly believe in the religion, what does that change?
Like I can absolutely abhor some of the things people have done in the name of medicine and often are still doing, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to stop going to doctors when I’m sick. Because I fundamentally believe in medical science and that I’m more likely to die without them. If you are raised catholic, there’s a good chance you fundamentally believe your eternal life is better if you continue to follow the religion. Sure, I probably have more proof, but their belief is just as strong.
Canadians as a dogwhistle for what, dare I ask? Or was that part of what you refused to ask?
That other countries do it doesn’t make it not horrifying. Almost all your examples are horrifying.
Only the last one isn’t. Being held pending trial if you threaten to flee the country? That makes sense.
deleted by creator
I think the second sentence makes it not. If the guy didn’t have a really good reason for doing so, the other people on the plane wouldn’t have supported his actions. It’s clickbaity. But the title to me makes it sound like the guy might be a hero.
You get an offer letter that spells some of that out, but it isn’t a binding contract.
Source