They asked random people on the Internet for dosage advice when there is professional advice available for free.

Why not use informed free advice instead of dubious free advice? How is that responsible?

This is a question for your pharmacist; they should be happy to help if you give them a call.

Not trying to be rude, but it’s a bad idea to take medical advice from people on the Internet.

As long as we’re wishing, I’m going with bigpox.

It’s really annoying how people confuse cynics with skeptics.

There is nothing “skeptical” about flat-out denying the efficacy or safety of vaccines; there is abundant evidence of both. Refusing to accept plain facts because your livelyhood depends on it is just plain cynical.

Isn’t sinking what submarines are built for?

Satan 2: This time, it’s personal.

BZ Basel also said Thomas was arrested the day after Ms Joksimovic’s body was found, and initially told investigators he had found her dead and dismembered her body in their laundry room in panic.

Let those who have not dismembered a family member in a panic with a jigsaw and garden shears before dissolving their pulped body in a bath of acid throw the first stone.

Sign my guestbook!

Wait, wait, wait.

You’re telling me there are other countries?

He’s bonafide!

I find cursive handwriting faster to read because the words are grouped together better.

Tacitus refers to Christians, which doesn’t necessarily mean that Jesus existed if he was an amalgamation of various apocalyptic prophets; there were many mystery cults at the time who had a legendary founder.

I think the chances are pretty good that he did exist, but it’s not a foregone conclusion.

Dunno if I’d call the guy who says he’s a literal god the most humble dude in history.

Of course it’s questionable if he did indeed make that claim (if he even really existed), but the Pope certainly believes that he did.

Why do you keep avoiding the topic?

The irony burns

Would it change your mind?

If not, it’s irrelevant. So why are you so hung up on that?

You’re playing games because you don’t want to discuss the actual issue.

Fair enough, I understand you’ll lose the debate.

If I did would it change your mind?

If not, why should I bother? This isn’t germaine, it’s a distraction because you don’t want to argue the actual point.

Funny how you’re always the only one who has trouble understanding me.

I’m done pretending you’re a serious person arguing seriously.

Anyone can say “nuh-uh.”

I also never said wealth was taxed. I said his income should be taxed (in response to your question).

You’re misrepresenting my argument at every step like you always do. Your sealion question at the end is irrelevant; you have no idea how much I earn, and I’m not here to impress Internet strangers like you seem to be. Bet you’re real close to that billion though if you keep grinding!

Bet it burns you up that you can’t ban me from here.

I will make it simple for you.

Elon typically earns 1 dollar per year.

How much should he pay in taxes on that 1 dollar?

And I’ll add back in the context that you’re desperate to jettison.

Let’s look at a situation that resembles the real world:

Elon Musk earns about $1.5 billion dollars/year with an estimated net worth of about $150 billion.

The median American income is about $70k/year with an estimated net worth of $193k

Musk should be taxed at 90% like we did for top earners during the biggest economic expansion in our nation’s history.

Your point is invalid. High-income earners already pay more in taxes, not only as a percentage but also as a total of their income.

And that wasn’t my point; you’re trying to change the argument because you know you’re wrong.

You don’t see the irony in wanting others to pay more but not wanting to pay more yourself.

I would love for you to point out where I said I wouldn’t be willing to pay more in taxes. This accusation is a confession, it seems.

If you actually read what I wrote you’d understand my point.

Nothing you said to me is a response to my post.

Try again.

Your peacocking value judgement is adorable, but irrelevant.