I would like them to justify their use of a private jet on video before they can pass. That would be hilarious.

Hahaha really? I was joking. Murica was playing the long game I guess.

Should have bought American. Other than Boeing. Sucks to suck.

-----> /s <------ There you go. I was joking Lemmy. Learn how to read between the fucking lines, tankie neck beards.

My favorite thing about arguing with racist Europeans is that they are CONVINCED they aren’t racist, even though they literally just told me that Syrians are disgusting people who need to go home. Or this totally true story you just said.

If you are starting to like a European, especially a German, make sure to ask them their opinions on Syrians and Turks. Their answers may surprise you!

They sure as fuck surprised me 😰

The post, not the site.

Did you just say people moving to the US for a better life are a part of imperialism?

Yes. Foreign or domestic. Who knows?

Cheers!

Hey Google. Write witty retort.

Can’t read.

That’s literally every far right person. They sure as fuck are never optimistic besides maybe selfishly. I imagine this has been true forever.

Holy shit. Just wow.

Dude, I really don’t give a damn about Israel. Seems like a nice place to visit. I know they’re killing civilians and I’ve said that. So why are you pushing me like I’m some shill? Because this video? There’s no evidence of any kind except observation. Anything else is conjecture, but there’s useless emotional conjecture and detached, deductive, logical type conjecture. I use belong in the latter.

I don’t know your source but I looked them up and they seem fine, with a possible bias as the founder is Pakistani, but who knows. A quote from another org inside of an article is not how to win people over. If you like a quote, go to the quote directly.

You’ve turned me off the conversation, with your baseless and cliche accusation, however. Insufferable.

Global Village Space? Thats where your link goes.

They aren’t listening, they’re reacting, like the others.

Stop being hung up on the unarmed thing. All the badguys in movies are armed to make it clear to the audience and make it “justified”. Unarmed soldiers and military personnel make up a much larger chunk of casualties than you realize. Terrorists don’t just toss their guns to the side and claim immunity. They are still targets.

Anyway, I’ve made my points clear, I’ve explained various things using traceable, sound logic. You seem to have to not read it or comprehended it. I’m not going to waste my time with unreasonable, volatile people.

You’re right, you can’t do that.

Also you’re wrong, you don’t need to prove that. At least not publicly which is what you seem to be implying. Intelligence has to prove that these people, or some of them, are Hamas, likely of some significance, maybe not. Then they have to be identified, monitored, and tracked for a strike opportunity. Then, when the entire chain of command is in agreement that that’s their guy and this is the best time, they attack.

In your version, the drone operator seems to have infinite ammo and gleeful fire-at-will orders. Killing anyone who is “just walking down the street.” Maybe the soldiers on the ground operate that way, but not drones or jets.

This reasoning is based on emotional assumptions and simplistic, naive logic.

The IDF doesn’t have to explain anything, and neither does Hamas. This is war, not a riot.

The source you gave is from a biased organization.

What makes it obvious?