Thank you for your perspective.
I had presumed it had more to do with us selling them weapons than anything so petty.
But the whole thing is moot, as you say. Just more empty posturing so we can pretend to be doing something.
Thank you for your perspective.
I had presumed it had more to do with us selling them weapons than anything so petty.
But the whole thing is moot, as you say. Just more empty posturing so we can pretend to be doing something.
Oh goddammit no.
Fuck’s sake.
Why did we challenge it in the first place?
Fuck I hate the tories.
What has this got to do with my comment?
Because they are attention seeking idiots.
As much as I understand their motivation, they repeatedly do stuff that cause problems for every day people.
Go find the people who run oil companies, the lobbyists that enable them and the politicians that take their bribes and do it to them, and I am all in.
Lot of people here saying ‘well duh’.
The target audience for UKIP, Reform, BNP, and whatever new name they come up with are gullible, and do not think critically.
People need to be reminded constantly that these parties are filled with fucking awful examples of the worst of humanity.
I don’t know what the solution to the migration crisis is, but I think history will look back on the Rwanda plan very unfavourably.
While not wishing to conflate genuine refugees with people who are entering the UK illegally, I feel that the hazardous journey people are willing to endure to get here suggests a far worse reality they are leaving. Is it not inhumane to refuse them entry?
On the other hand, the UK does not have finite resources. Our public services have been whittled away for decades. The NHS is on life support, the Police and social services are hopelessly overwhelmed. Schooling is at breaking point.
Eorope has no incentive to do anything but just drum migrants though the Calais border, but they pretty much did that anyway before Brexit.
What is the viable and humane solution?
I would love to know what the real figures were.
Could he have won without cheating, or will his ego not even allow a reasonable tally against him?
Thank you for this.
Ha Thank you very much.
Is this a reference to something. I foofled it but no light was shed.
From the context I presume it is a way of saying it’s a book no one would read, but is there more to it?
Yes. The concept of a thin blue line is not a good way to put it.
While I believe the UK charity was originally associated with mental health of Police officers, it would probably be a good idea to distance itself from the far right American police symbol.
This title is total bollocks.
As for the opinion if the author, I can understand their frustration, but calling for bans and mandates for political opinions, however abhorrent they may be does not work.