

Did you read the article? That’s exactly what it said.
Did you read the article? That’s exactly what it said.
It’s a little uneven because they seem to basically rotate the new people in for suicide missions in small groups. So there’s still a pool of people farther in the rear not getting hit at such high rates.
I assume you would only do that on like a sample document for a client or a draft, specifically so it won’t be used in an actual court.
Serious trucks are duallies and haul big trailers.
In theory if you didn’t have heating you could get a cheap used machine and run it and the revenue might cover the cost of heating and you get a free to run space heater.
For basic stuff like rice the US produces way more than it needs, the only real imports I see are for specialty stuff like jasmine rice or bhasmati rice from Thailand or India. Basic long grain rice or calrose is domestic and very cheap.
The dollar is internal and farmers make annual purchases so they will have already bought their stuff they need for this season so they shouldn’t be too affected by exchange rates. The US makes its own oil and derivatives like fertilizer and farm equipment so they shouldn’t be too affected for now.
For this current season specifically there will be a glut of food and not enough buyers. In the future if these farmers go out of business then prices could increase.
There is more supply than needed, we normally make so much we export huge quantities. How does restricted food exports increase prices domestically?
The comments about capitalism and price gouging and stuff are all fine and correct. But that would logically apply whether the exports were restricted or not. But they have to do something with all the food they were going to export or not. Sometimes they’ll just burn it or dump milk but they can probably sell, just at a lower price or pay more to ship it farther away. Now long term yes if these farmers go out of business then prices could increase if the supply shrinks but that doesn’t really apply to this year.
The problem with the reasoning I see here is that you lot are taking things you heard and applying them to this situation, but you just say capitalism and that’s the end of your argument. Supply and demand still affect prices, especially on a large scale and with commodity goods.
No this is for everything including personal devices. It’s very simple to just say it’s like everyone listening to their phone on speakerphone and the louder it is and the closer you are the more distracting it is to you. Everyone can use it but the more crowded it is the more problems you have. If everyone uses it responsibly then everyone can use it and it’s fine. That’s why the FCC sets power limits because otherwise you could jack up the signal with a ton of power and no one else can hear anything. For signals it is only the same frequency that interferes with each other but all the space comsats use the same popular KU band so they have to share nicely.
Quality maybe but there’s no reason domestically produced food should go up a lot. The fact that China refused tons of pork and soy beans imports from America means there will be a glut and that means terrible finances for farmers but hardly expensive food.
Most food in the US is domestically produced, so no. The US is a huge exporter of food outside of specialty goods and tropical things.
FCC power limits are generally to prevent spectrum corruption, like they don’t want your radio to overpower everyone else. So yes, more power is generally better for the signal but it’s a shared pool of limited spectrum so your use can hurt other people.
Domestically produced food shouldn’t go up that much.
And yet I know more than you and am correct. Maybe because you are just guessing and don’t have actual first hand knowledge.
It is quite common to have CDL drivers that only speak Spanish whether or not they’re supposed to be able to speak English.
You can’t because while there is a correlation it’s not 1:1. Ultimately the costs get passed on to the consumer but there will be lots of adjustments. Unless you’re buying a product and it comes straight from China individually it won’t be just one number.
Profit. Aws is profitable. Products make most of their revenue, it’s just that selling junk for cheap is low margin so it’s low profit. But their costs mostly stay the same whether they sell junk or not, so it does matter whether they sell a lot or not.
Even lightweight glasses can be irritating and the extra weight from steel v plastic is noticeable. There will never be ar glasses or goggles that are comfortable to wear all the time.
It’s been over a decade since the oculus rift came out and there hasn’t been much improvement.
Would it be legal if they made him speaker after jan and then had the pres and vp resign?