As a terrorist they could torture and kill him without covering anything up.
As a terrorist they could torture and kill him without covering anything up.
He didn’t leak, he published.
That’s what’s so concerning about the case. The USA tried to persecute an Australian citizen working out of the EU for publishing information.
If precedent was set they could kidnap anyone from sovereign countries based on US law
This comment seems contentious. Are the differences in opinion political? An ideological opposition?
.
Thank you for your comment, it provided more context than the article
Relevant comments regarding moderation, for context https://aussie.zone/post/6548147
This has been a journey and I’ve absorbed a lot. I’m going to go touch some grass and chat to someone about the weather. Goodbye Lemmy, I hope you sort this one out.
I agree our media is incredibly controlled.
However, this summer didn’t feel different, it got to 45C as normal in Perth, the heatwaves did not feel longer or worse.
Maybe we’re frogs in water but I’d say such an article would not engage the public
How much was WeWork valued at without turning a profit?
Libreoffice calc does not have the functionality Excel does.
In Australia an official diagnosis can be used against you in legal proceedings. Such as, custody hearings. For this reason medical professionals will often recommended against official diagnosis as an adult, unless the diagnosis will have beneficial outcomes.
Alternatively, they may just be trying to identify your goals. This will inform them how to structure their therapy. No point working on an area which doesn’t affect your quality of life or one you don’t care about and won’t do the homework for. If there is no therapy for your concerns and a diagnosis won’t help, they shouldn’t waste your time and money getting one.
This also ignores the growing middle class in China and India. Countries will have to be quality of life competitive or they will experience brain drain to the west.
Agreed, my bad
The 1967 amendment already did that. But yes, the campaigns were about the voice, not recognition of first nations people
The title is hugely misrepresenting the referendum.
Not even our conservative party, the liberals, opposed recognition of aboriginal and Torres islander people as the traditional owners of the land.
The neo liberal progressive party, labor, put in a change to political process. This is what people disagreed with.
As this doesn’t interfere with mining interests or criticism of the government the AFP will be sleeping through any antisemitic sentiment
Gotta love media wording.
Both a prisoners of war, many are civilians on both sides. But one group have prisoners and the other have hostages.
They should investigate, sure. However, the true test is in the court’s. A ruling supporting that Momika’s demonstration is in protest and does not preditorally target a religious group would be of benefit to future activists.
What is with the down votes? What are you disagreeing with?
I don’t trust the source, but why downvote without comment?
Studies are easier to beat people over the head with. A rolled up journal hurts more than an opinion column.
Additionally, they have stats on exactly how much money the program saved. Good to be able to pitch a social program making the county/state/country money.
Land use is the main contributor. The OP article is knot great. Seaweed only helps with methane. Still, good.
Yeah, the main focus of greenhouse gasses in the literature is from land use. The amount of land used for rumanents and their feedstock could plant forests the world over. And don’t get me started, noone is farming on the sides of mountains
That’s what’s so concerning about the case. The USA tried to persecute an Australian citizen working out of the EU for publishing information.
As he is not a US citizen he was not able to use the X amendment to free speech.