Izzy

It sounds like the latency is really important here and not necessarily the bandwidth. That makes sense.

I can already burn through my entire wireless data limit in minutes. What is the point in it being faster without data being cheaper? At least from a users perspective and not someone who owns a telecommunications company.

I do remember that. I suppose not enough people would ever use it for things to ever balance out.

I want to see a website that links to whatever is the least viewed Wikipedia article at any given time until all Wikipedia articles basically have the same number of views.

The grift that keeps on grifting.

Wow, $80. I haven’t looked into these devices since the first one, but I thought the point of them was to be very cheap. I do wonder what these new more powerful ones are capable of. Perhaps the performance justifies the price.

I don’t think there is a better tool for web automation. Selenium is pretty much the industry standard. However, you can use Selenium across a wide variety of languages and browsers.

It is at least a different problem, but adding in the element that any failure is a fatal one it just isn’t enough that there are less obstacles in the way.

Agreed. I already don’t trust car automation. No way I’m going to add a 3rd dimension to the list of possible failures.

I wonder if they mean optical instead of image here. It would make a lot of sense if that were the case.

What is a laser image transmission? Is the laser an image that is transmitting data within that image or is it a laser that is transmitting data in the form of images? 😐

Good point. I guess there is a reason that is the highest setting.

What is considered a high bitrate? There isn’t much reason to go higher than 320 kb/s on an mp3.

Those groups of people might be of the misunderstanding that people are still listening to them just because they are paying money.

It’s a wonder that there is anyone still buying Tesla cars.