Or kill it completely. The only reason I’ve held off signing this is that the wording is so vague that it could work in favor of gaming companies. I’d rather not see that.
Or kill it completely. The only reason I’ve held off signing this is that the wording is so vague that it could work in favor of gaming companies. I’d rather not see that.
It’s a web app wrapped in Tauri. So basically a desktop app, but the web app can be hosted too.
You’re using a purposely convoluted example from the spec. And I think it shows exactly how TOML is better than JSON for creating config files.
The TOML file is a lot easier to scan than the hopelessly messy json file. The mix of indentation and symbols used in JSON really does not do well in bigger configuration files.
That’s not the point. We already know Musk is bad.
Not sure why the judge can’t be bad too.
I guess saying “Elon bad” is enough to be a hero in Lemmy’s eyes?
I hate this, always wanted to visit Georgia, seems like a gorgeous country.
No worries, I travelled to the USA multiple times and came back safely.
It’s entirely possible though? Surprised that people don’t know this.
You of course need to follow some strict rules and can only go see the government sanctioned sights and tours. From what I remember it’s a lot of propaganda monuments and some caves.
Just behave and it’s not really risky or anything. It does sound pretty dull to me though.
Not sure if this is supposed to be a joke comment or just weird.
I’d love to see you quote what you think you’re reading there.
I think you need to reread that. It doesn’t say anything about a “high” bias
They are not. Currently Russian and Belarusian athlete are invited as Individual Neutral Athletes because of the Ukrainian war.
The Dutch wikipedia explains that according to research, 25% to 50% acts because of a sexual preference for minors.
The others only act because they see an easy opportunity to have sex, or worse, want to exploit them.
I guess that’s what he bases his statement on?
Just a bunch of downplaying stuff with definitions and nonsense talk in my opinion.
This post misses the entire point of JSON/TOML/YAML and the big advantage it has over databases: readability.
Using a file based approach sounds horrible. Context gets lost very easily, as I need to browse and match outputs of a ton of files to get the full picture, where the traditional methods allow me to see that nearly instantly.
I also chuckled at the exact, horribly confusing example you give: upd_at. A metadata file for an object that already inherently has that metadata. It’s metadata on top of metadata, which makes it all the more confusing what the actual truth for the object is.
It also raises red flags about what they (hopefully don’t) have in mind for the future
No, you have it the other way around. It means copyright owners can share “corrupted” versions of their works and the AI can still use it. Possible AI leaks won’t return the original work, since it was never used.
Of course I think this is only one aspect of why artists wouldn’t share their works, but it’s not the point the paper is trying to make. They’re just giving an aspect of how it could be useful.
It’s not what the paper is about at all, seems this is just shit journalism again.
All the paper says about copyright is that this method is more secure because AI can sometimes spit out training examples.
Old railway lines in Europe often aren’t complete anymore and only cover relatively small distances.
There simply isn’t enough infrastructure to handle a full train network and fixing them up would probably require existing infrastructure and buildings to be disowned and destroyed.
The wheel is just there during the testing phase as a backup, seems the final pods don’t have it, as it would make the idea useless.
And there’s the problem. Why should Hamas be called a terrorist and not the Israel government?
This is why news organisations avoid the word. It clearly picks a side.
Multiple ways.
Companies can completely erase the idea of ownership. If everything is subscription-based, they can simply stop the subscription and have no further obligations.
Or Europe just gets completely locked out of functionality, as already happens in some European countries.
Of course good things can come from this, but I’ve read here several times that this just isn’t a good proposition and might just lead to the anti-consumer practices disappearing in a negative way too.