Donald Trump won the popular vote in an election with record setting voter turnout. Lack of democracy from the electoral college or voter suppression didn’t do this. People voting for Trump did.

Hey look! Someone who only read the headline!

This is like, technically a weapon. It’s a tool for destroying enemy missiles in the air before they impact their target. It’s about as purely defensive of a weapon as you can get.

The US soldiers are operating the missile defense system, so there’s not room for Israel to “creatively” repurpose them. They aren’t assisting in any missions in Palestine, they’re purely defending against Iranian missiles.

Nobody cares what Trump sycophants think. They are already voting for Trump and nothing is going to change that.

To a reasonable person who is unmotivated to vote (the REAL demographic that needs to be courted), this makes the Trump team look absolutely deranged.

THAT’S how you take down a Gish Gallop.

“I don’t give a fuck what you’re trying to pivot to. Do you trust Maduro’s statistics?”

The FBI recently came into some hard evidence about Russia’s interference actions.

Famous chefs who have more people requesting them than they have time in the day, so they go to whoever pays the most.

Like, Gordon Ramsey still does private events, but only if they pay more than he could be making with his TV deals.

So like, the ad didn’t even say anything about the genocide in Palestine? It just starred a half-Palestinian model?

Wait until you see the Nepalese flag. It’s not even a rectangle!

(It’s also the only flag in the world to be mathematically defined by its country’s constitution)

That could realistically be around 1/3 yearly profit in a reasonable company (18% operating margin is common). No idea whether Twitter is currently profitable (it wasn’t when he bought it).

While I agree with the sentiment here, this is pretty 1-dimensional. For one, US support of Ukraine actually has little to do with democracy and everything to do with national sovereignty. One nation with imperial ambitions invaded another nation without pretense, US provides aid to stave off that invasion.

Hypocritical given US history of imperialism? Sure. But it’s NOT imperialism under the mask of democracy.

Similar arguments apply to various points on this list. Supporting NATO is about maintaining a military alliance against common enemies, not spreading democracy.

I get a mental image of The Bad Donald crossed with Rick & Morty’s Elon Tusk.

Latvia is actually in NATO, not just receiving support from NATO countries. This is meaningless bluster.

What is your background. “A job using Linux” is super broad and remote work only narrows it further. If you don’t have plenty of experience, it’ll be hard to get a remote position.

In what dialect do those two words rhyme?

Yeah but Putin dying is like the tiniest shade of gray below “Russia Collapses” at this point.

It was an Indian man, but I’m aware of any evidence he was an operative of the Indian government.

Edit: Dumbass me, commenting before reading the article.

In short, yes, Islam varies a lot based on the actual community you’re a part of. Few places are as extreme as Afghanistan, even if you look at other conservative theocracies. When you’re looking at Muslim communities in Western Europe, it’s a very different situation.