If you’re going to remove 90% of the content on lemmy, is there even a point staying on it?
I said EU, not UK. But it turns out they ARE licensed in the UK as well.
Revolut should be watching for suspicious transactions and blocking them like proper banks are required to do.
There’s nothing in the article to indicate this isn’t already the case. No suspicious activity algorithm will be foolproof. Also, revolut is certified as an actual bank in the EU, and subject to the standard bank regulations.
All I’m reading in this article is stupid people who don’t follow basic security practices. Why is any of this Revolut’s fault?
The autistic part is literally in the article and was brought up during the defense
Yeah no, there’s plenty of .ml users who have no idea of the political leanings of the server, I agree. Which is why I made it very clear I was kidding. I’m still keeping the instance blocked though.
Can I just downvote them anyway for being from .ml? (kidding)
That’s what the block function is for. Don’t like somebody’s posting habits? Block them
Does it help?
So you’re saying, the US just bombed Japan?
The main problem here is it’s delaying adoption of EVs, which is hurting the environment and is an externalised cost that somehow never gets accounted for.
You do. But the point stands, on the scale of a govt budget, having a single full time employee (and even that is honestly overkill) is a drop in the ocean.
Apparently not, if you’re still thinking of Fediverse moderation as a single entity.
I think we’ve established at this point the Russian military is more of a pointy stick than a sabre
You do understand that the fediverse is not a single thing? Moderation on the fediverse is a meaningless term because it varies hugely depending which part of the fediverse you are visiting.
How much funding does a single software instance serving 3500 users really require? I could probably run it off my desktop.
They had strong safety nets and all the necessities they needed, but lacked the fun toys.
Yeah, those damn people queueing up in bread lines when they had all the air and water they needed!
By the same logic however, mods would have no power to actually moderate. Their moderation ability is directly proportional to their potential for abuse. And I think we can all agree we’ve long passed the point where communities are able to survive without moderation, at least in their current form (which is what OP is discussing).