Huh. I gave it a try, and while drunk, i just went on and on, but overall it just smelled so bad that it never became a habit. I guess i’m lucky
Huh. I gave it a try, and while drunk, i just went on and on, but overall it just smelled so bad that it never became a habit. I guess i’m lucky
I didn’t say density is the paramount parameter. Also, once you optimize one drawback, it generally gets less important.
I just wanted to put the image into context, and show that it isn’t a big step backwards, just sideways perhaps. Or in other words, a sigle wind farm isn’t relevant, the sum is
It’s about density. Renewables Are great, but not on terms of value add per square foot. The coal under the wind mill is worth orders of magnitude more than the windmill.
And, it’s not as bad as it sounds. In general, the number of windmills keeps increasing.
I guess snipers are the first ones to be picked off by enemy drones(think nicht vision).
I expect the drone pilots to be relatively safe.
I think even In WW1 most days didn’t see much action in the trenches. So slow ‘progress’ with drones is better than no progress. Also, the drones are obviously auxiliary, and not the main strategy
If Russia wins, the war is over, but the people won’t enjoy peace under Putin’s KGB gang.
Also, the soldiers have probably spent months in trenches, and 99.99% of the time there isn’t a drone to spot. After a while they just won’t even look for one.
The effectiveness is huge. Just consider the k/d ratio.
And also the money spent per kill.
If you’re in any way accustomed to military expenditures, the cost of these drone kills is negligible.
No, i actually meant to be constructive. Nevermind
I just wanted to point out that we have choice. Though it seems redundant, because everyone who end up on Lemmy should know that
Well, then go to a nice community, perhaps even a different instance.
That decline is slower than I expected. It shows that more people stay than not
Trench warfare. But honestly I think from a global perspective this outcome isn’t too bad. It just shows that wars aren’t profitable, thus making them less likely. That’s why all intelligent countries stopped invading their neighbors a while ago
His statement isn’t really about the severity of the issue, he just says that people are prone to give up
Someone correct me if I’m wrong.
Operating nodes is expensive, offers no reward, and comes with a serious legal risk.
This won’t stop the NSA from operating a few. I assume that a significant portion of Tor nodes is run by intelligence agencies. If they control all nodes used for a connection(i believe three are used), they can probably piece together what connections a user is having.
I’m under the impression that my use will only make it slower for people who really need it.
Can Lemmy even protect itself against spam while being open?
This reminds me that they finance the Tor project (onion browser).
Oh no! The country that we are shooting at has decided to shoot back!
I’m pretty sure i’m gone
Our exchange here is public, a gift to humanity and all aliens that might stumble upon it. If meta can make money from it, so be it. But anyone else can just as well.
There are some American news sites that don’t serve to European users for that reason. Instead, we get a screan that explains that GDPR is too much for them to handle.
It can be circumvented with a VPN, but I haven’t bothered so far
Afaik NZ has already implemented such a rule.