• John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    For sure. Linux has a lot of great apps but there are times where it’ll become incredibly frustrating. For example, file explorers can be basic & frustrating… The best you’ll prob get is Dolphin.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Linux has the best file manager I’ve found on any platform: Krusader. It has twin panels, and a lot of the functionality is bound to FKeys: F2 Rename, F3 View, F4 Edit, F5 Copy, etc. F9 will open a terminal in the current directory. You can edit text files and uncompress zipped files from within Krusader. I’ve even done it on a remote filesystem over SSH.

    • SnortsGarlicPowder@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Isn’t Windows File Explorer considered basic? It only just got tabs in 11 right? That and clicking on a disconnected network share would cause it to hang for a good few minutes.

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It isn’t perfect by any means, but compared to Nautilus & many others, it still has a lot of benefits that make things quicker overall.

    • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      I still contend that the best file browser ever made is the macOS Finder. When someone makes something that good for Linux, I’ll be very happy

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        What. What?? Finder is the fucking worst. It doesn’t have a sensible tree view, does it?

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 days ago

            Sidebar defaults are bad. There’s no home directory. How do you get to your home directory? Cmd+shift+H, but can you get there without that special shortcut? You can’t see the file system’s structure in Finder. The GUI doesn’t have a way to go “up” in the directory structure. I don’t think you can do it in the GUI alone.

            It won’t let you see stuff in like \tmp\ without a fight, too. I don’t know how to open stuff in places like that without cd’ing to the location in the terminal, and doing open . in the desired directory.

            The list view is the least bad, but it gets unwieldy if your directories are deeply nested. It’s also bad if you started in the middle of the tree and want to go up. Gallery and column view are really bad for anything non trivial.

            I often want to see the entire file path, and it really doesn’t want to cooperate. If I do find the file I’m looking for, and want the full path, it doesn’t want to give it. I don’t even know if there is a way to get it. Other than like cmd+clicking -> “new iterm2 tab here” -> pwd, which is not really that helpful of Finder.

            Contrast with windows’ default explorer. It’s not perfect and I think windows11 made it worse, but still. Open it up, there’s the “my pc”, click through to my user directory, music, some album, then i can click the top thing and get the path. I can also see the whole tree on the left.

            Whatever I was using in Mint was similar to windows’ Explorer. Had no complaints about it.

                • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  That would be a waste of my time. You’re not someone who needs to know how to use one, so what’s the point of telling you how to use one? You’re an intelligent human being, you can figure it out if and when you need to. Until then, whatever tech you’re using serves your needs so it’s no biggie.

      • Noxy@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Genuine question, is this trolling or do you seriously believe this?

            • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Well, Windows Explorer is terrible, Dolphin is better but still not really that great, Nautilus is stripped back and barebones, Thunar is ancient and barely competes with what Windows XP had, and vifm is unreasonable unless you exclusively work in terminals. Did I miss any that are even remotely popular?

              • Noxy@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Dolphin seems great to me! What do you think Finder does better than Dolphin?

                • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  In fairness, Dolphin is definitely the best available on Linux. I think Finder strikes the perfect balance of simplicity and customization. It’s easy to figure out for a newbie and powerful enough for a developer. Dolphin’s learning curve is a bit steeper and in my view it has too many features on offer. This is a common problem with KDE software. It’s not a big deal because KDE stuff isn’t used on commercially-available products that need tech support, and anyone using Linux should be able to get by just fine with it, but I still think Finder is simply better software with a longer history and judicious use of new features

                  • Noxy@pawb.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 hour ago

                    KDE stuff isn’t used on commercially-available products that need tech support

                    I’m sure there are organizations using Plasma desktop with IT departments supporting it, but I definitely take your point that Apple has orders of magnitude more spending on UI/UX and software development

                    I’m largely curious about Finder these days since I used macOS almost exclusively from the G4 days right up until about the time they switched to ARM, so it’s been a few years. I’m curious if Apple has made any significant improvements to Finder in the past, say, four years?