• bluGill@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    For most of history you would be better off if you could kill the next village over. You want to be friends with the people in your village, but if you kill the next one you can expand your farm/hunting/gathering grounds and then leave it to your kids - while otherwise you won’t have enough food for all the kids and your DNA is in danger of not getting passed on.

    In our modern world we mostly have plenty of food (and when we don’t lack of land is not the issue), but that isn’t what our DNA is evolved to “think”

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      For most of history you would be better off if you could kill the next village over.

      That is an incredibly stupid take. For most of history, the planet was so vast that people had plenty of room to hunt / farm / whatever. And no, killing other humans is not in our DNA, the only people who feel like that are those with brain damage / development defects.

      • bluGill@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Most of the planet was not accessable. It was there but your local population grew until the land couldn’t support more. There wasn’t much opportunity to move as the surronding villages had the same problem.

        of course when a famon came you got a few generations of peace here and there