• Sordid@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    “there are already mines so spreading more is good”?

    More like “tons of mines are being placed every day, so stopping that from happening is good”.

    • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah sry i jumped the gun on hitting post.

      I meant to add: it’s tragic enough that mines are deployed so much in this conflict.

      I personally think saying cluster munitions will end it quicker ergo result in less uxos is a bit simplified a->b thinking that rarely works out in reality.

      I think UA should absolutely aim to limit uxos from their side as much as realisticly possible, and i dont know if CMs are as big of a power swing as you make em out to be.

      Fortunately (in my eyes), they pledged not to use these measures already

      • Sordid@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Eh… I figure if CMs weren’t effective, they wouldn’t be using them. There’s a good reason the military heavyweights refuse to join the international treaty that bans them.

        Also, the whole discussion is basically moot, since apparently Ukraine has been using old Soviet CMs all along anyway. Getting more modern American ones with a much lower percentage of duds will be nothing but an improvement.