• Vorticity@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve never understood how civil asset forfeiture is constitutional. It seems like a 4th amendment violation.

    Can someone point me to the judicial decisions that lead to this being legal?

    • SlowNPC@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is a 4th amendment violation, but some shit judge ruled otherwise at some point so they get to pretend it isn’t.

    • socphoenix@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the article they stated one of the drivers did that, so they brought in a “drug dog” that of course signaled at the car so they took that as cause to search. I bet that dog just signals at every car it sees